Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.44 seconds)
Documents citing S. Govindarajulu, D.J., Now Working On ... vs High Court Of Andhra Pradesh Rep. By Its ... on 23 March, 2007

Gopal Bihari vs The Honble High Court Of Judicature At ... on 12 July, 2024

Insofar as question No.94 is concerned, we have already held that candidates who marked both options; ie: (c) & (d) have to be qualified, in C.W.J.C. No.9263 of 2024 Ashutosh Kumar Mishra v. The High Court of Judicature at Patna. There is a revision of the marks effected based on the cited case, and the revised results are also published wherein an additional 16 candidates were called for the main examination from the different categories. The cut-off marks were also revised, as is seen from the counter-affidavit. The cut-off mark provided earlier and that revised is seen from Annexure-R-2C of the counter affidavit which is extracted hereinbelow:-
Patna High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Krishna Kumar Singh vs The High Court Of Judicature At Patna on 12 July, 2024

Insofar as question No.94 is concerned, we have already held that candidates who marked both options; ie: (c) & (d) have to be qualified, in C.W.J.C. No.9263 of 2024 Ashutosh Kumar Mishra v. The High Court of Judicature at Patna. There is a revision of the marks effected based on the cited case, and the revised results are also published wherein an additional 16 candidates were called for the main examination from the different categories. The cut-off marks were also revised, as is seen from the counter-affidavit. The cut-off mark provided earlier and that revised is seen from Annexure-R-2C of the counter affidavit which is extracted hereinbelow:-
Patna High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ghanshyam vs The High Court Of Judicature on 12 July, 2024

Insofar as question No.94 is concerned, we have already held that candidates who marked both options; ie: (c) & (d) have to be qualified, in C.W.J.C. No.9263 of 2024 Ashutosh Kumar Mishra v. The High Court of Judicature at Patna. There is a revision of the marks effected based on the cited case, and the revised results are also published wherein an additional 16 candidates were called for the main examination from the different categories. The cut-off marks were also revised, as is seen from the counter-affidavit. The cut-off mark provided earlier and that revised is seen from Annexure-R-2C of the counter affidavit which is extracted hereinbelow:-
Patna High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rup Anand Krishn vs The State Of Bihar on 12 July, 2024

Insofar as question No.94 is concerned, we have already held that candidates who marked both options; ie: (c) & (d) have to be qualified, in C.W.J.C. No.9263 of 2024 Ashutosh Kumar Mishra v. The High Court of Judicature at Patna. There is a revision of the marks effected based on the cited case, and the revised results are also published wherein an additional 16 candidates were called for the main examination from the different categories. The cut-off marks were also revised, as is seen from the counter-affidavit. The cut-off mark provided earlier and that revised is seen from Annexure-R-2C of the counter affidavit which is extracted hereinbelow:-
Patna High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shashi Ranjan vs The High Court Of Judicature At Patna on 12 July, 2024

Insofar as question No.94 is concerned, we have already held that candidates who marked both options; ie: (c) & (d) have to be qualified, in C.W.J.C. No.9263 of 2024 Ashutosh Kumar Mishra v. The High Court of Judicature at Patna. There is a revision of the marks effected based on the cited case, and the revised results are also published wherein an additional 16 candidates were called for the main examination from the different categories. The cut-off marks were also revised, as is seen from the counter-affidavit. The cut-off mark provided earlier and that revised is seen from Annexure-R-2C of the counter affidavit which is extracted hereinbelow:-
Patna High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1