Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.24 seconds)

B.T.C. Utirna Sangh vs State on 11 February, 1992

1. Petitioner is an Association of persons who hold qualification of Basic Training Course. Petition has been filed for the benefit of the persons, named in the Schedule attached with the writ petition. The persons named in the Schedule have obtained B.T.C. certificate from Bihar Pradesh Shiksha Parishad, Sripalpur on different dates but all prior to 13th October, 1987 upto which date the certificate was recognised as equivalent to B.S.T.C. for eligibility for appointment on the post of Gr. Ill teacher in Rajasthan. With effect from 13th Oct. 1987, the Certificate, issued by the aforesaid Parishad has been de-recognised for the purposes of considering eligibility of its holder for appointment as Teacher Gr. III. It is contended that this Court has taken a view in number of cases more particularly in [i) D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2859/87 Hari Ram v. State of Raj. decided on 25.4.88, (ii) D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 841 /88 Rakshpal Ram v. State of Raj. decided on 7.9.88 [iii) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4301/89 Barmer Zila Bihar Pradesh Shiksha Parishad, Sripalpur Shikshak Sangh v. State of Raj. decided on 1.1 2.89 and [iv] S.B. Civil Writ petition No. 2291/89 Soma Ram Deora v. State of Raj. decided on 21.5.89 that those who have obtained admission in the aforesaid B.T.C. course before 13.10.1987 will be deemed to have possessed recognised qualification for the purpose of appointment as Teacher Gr. III. Inspite of the decisions of this Court , the respondents are not considering the case of the persons, named in the Schedule by treating them not possessed of necessary qualification, equivalent to B.T.C. training.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Hari Ram vs State Of Rajasthan on 9 December, 1997

By this petition under Section 482 Cr. P.C. it is prayed that the criminal appeal No. 16/92 Hari Ram v. State of Rajasthan filed under Section 63 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act,1985 be transferred from the Court of Special Judge, Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities Act), Cases cum-Additional Sessions Judge, Jodhpur to the Court of District and Sessions Judge, Jodhpur. The ground on which the prayer for transfer of the appeal has been made is that Sub-section (3) of Section 63 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act requires the appeal to be filed before the Court of Sessions and, therefore, it is the District and Sessions Judge only who can hear and dispose of the appeal and an Additional Sessions Judge, who is of the same rank as the Special Judge appointed under the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act cannot hear the appeals filed under Section 63 of the NDPS Act.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1