Mr. Sant Dayal vs Shri Sita Ram on 1 July, 2013
6. The defendant has filed the written statement on
14.09.2009 controverting the allegations levelled against him and has
submitted that plaintiff has not come to the Court with clean hands
and has concealed the true facts. The plaintiff is not in possession of
Suit No. 178/2009 Sant Dayal Vs. Sita Ram
6
the suit property, hence the question of forcible dispossess does not
arise at all. The plaintiff was inducted as a tenant in respect of the
suit property by Mrs. Bhagwani Devi at the rate of Rs.60/ per month
for few months. He has assured to vacate the tenanted premises but
later he became adamant. There was no electricity or water
connection in the suit property at that time. However, the plaintiff has
enhanced the rent in about 1985 up to Rs.100/, in 1990 up to Rs.
150/ per month, in 1995 up to Rs.250/ per month and also agreed to
pay rent @ Rs.400/ per month with effect from First January, 2000.
The plaintiff further paid rent up to March, 2004 @ Rs.600/ per
month and thereafter he left the room after taking his belongings and
leaving the waste things there under his lock and key and his
whereabouts were not known to the defendant.