Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 48 (2.12 seconds)
Documents citing Karamjeet Kaur vs State Of Punjab & Another on 6 June, 2019

Subordinate Services Selection Board ... vs Sukhchain Singh on 9 April, 2025

16. Even otherwise the said arguments looses its vigor on the trite factum, that in various writ petition(s) i.e. LPA No.465, 503, 521 17 of 39 ::: Downloaded on - 15-04-2025 07:32:46 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:050005-DB LPA-1843-2019 and connected cases -18- and 529 of 2021) the University Grants Commission, was impleaded as a party and after notice being issued to the University Grants Commission, though an appearance was made on behalf of the University Grants Commission, but yet subsequently no reply to the averments made in the writ petition become furnished by the UGC. Moreover, no appeal till date has been preferred by the UGC against the decision passed by this Court in Karamjeet Kaur's case (supra), wherebys, conclusivity is acquired to the said verdict, especially appertaining to the recognition of degrees obtained by the employees concerned but with prescription therein of a cut off date, prescription whereof for reasons assigned hereafter is untenable.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Komila Chopra vs State Of Punjab And Another on 9 April, 2025

16. Even otherwise the said arguments looses its vigor on the trite factum, that in various writ petition(s) i.e. LPA No.465, 503, 521 17 of 39 ::: Downloaded on - 15-04-2025 07:32:15 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:050005-DB LPA-1843-2019 and connected cases -18- and 529 of 2021) the University Grants Commission, was impleaded as a party and after notice being issued to the University Grants Commission, though an appearance was made on behalf of the University Grants Commission, but yet subsequently no reply to the averments made in the writ petition become furnished by the UGC. Moreover, no appeal till date has been preferred by the UGC against the decision passed by this Court in Karamjeet Kaur's case (supra), wherebys, conclusivity is acquired to the said verdict, especially appertaining to the recognition of degrees obtained by the employees concerned but with prescription therein of a cut off date, prescription whereof for reasons assigned hereafter is untenable.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State Of Punjab And Another vs Gurnam Singh on 9 April, 2025

16. Even otherwise the said arguments looses its vigor on the trite factum, that in various writ petition(s) i.e. LPA No.465, 503, 521 17 of 39 ::: Downloaded on - 15-04-2025 07:33:49 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:050005-DB LPA-1843-2019 and connected cases -18- and 529 of 2021) the University Grants Commission, was impleaded as a party and after notice being issued to the University Grants Commission, though an appearance was made on behalf of the University Grants Commission, but yet subsequently no reply to the averments made in the writ petition become furnished by the UGC. Moreover, no appeal till date has been preferred by the UGC against the decision passed by this Court in Karamjeet Kaur's case (supra), wherebys, conclusivity is acquired to the said verdict, especially appertaining to the recognition of degrees obtained by the employees concerned but with prescription therein of a cut off date, prescription whereof for reasons assigned hereafter is untenable.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State Of Punjab And Another vs Sukhdev Raj on 9 April, 2025

16. Even otherwise the said arguments looses its vigor on the trite factum, that in various writ petition(s) i.e. LPA No.465, 503, 521 17 of 39 ::: Downloaded on - 15-04-2025 07:34:32 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:050005-DB LPA-1843-2019 and connected cases -18- and 529 of 2021) the University Grants Commission, was impleaded as a party and after notice being issued to the University Grants Commission, though an appearance was made on behalf of the University Grants Commission, but yet subsequently no reply to the averments made in the writ petition become furnished by the UGC. Moreover, no appeal till date has been preferred by the UGC against the decision passed by this Court in Karamjeet Kaur's case (supra), wherebys, conclusivity is acquired to the said verdict, especially appertaining to the recognition of degrees obtained by the employees concerned but with prescription therein of a cut off date, prescription whereof for reasons assigned hereafter is untenable.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State Of Punjab And Another vs Punam Arora And Others on 9 April, 2025

16. Even otherwise the said arguments looses its vigor on the trite factum, that in various writ petition(s) i.e. LPA No.465, 503, 521 17 of 39 ::: Downloaded on - 15-04-2025 07:35:02 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:050005-DB LPA-1843-2019 and connected cases -18- and 529 of 2021) the University Grants Commission, was impleaded as a party and after notice being issued to the University Grants Commission, though an appearance was made on behalf of the University Grants Commission, but yet subsequently no reply to the averments made in the writ petition become furnished by the UGC. Moreover, no appeal till date has been preferred by the UGC against the decision passed by this Court in Karamjeet Kaur's case (supra), wherebys, conclusivity is acquired to the said verdict, especially appertaining to the recognition of degrees obtained by the employees concerned but with prescription therein of a cut off date, prescription whereof for reasons assigned hereafter is untenable.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Punjab Subordinate Services Selection ... vs Kamal Krishan And Others on 9 April, 2025

16. Even otherwise the said arguments looses its vigor on the trite factum, that in various writ petition(s) i.e. LPA No.465, 503, 521 17 of 39 ::: Downloaded on - 15-04-2025 07:36:59 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:050005-DB LPA-1843-2019 and connected cases -18- and 529 of 2021) the University Grants Commission, was impleaded as a party and after notice being issued to the University Grants Commission, though an appearance was made on behalf of the University Grants Commission, but yet subsequently no reply to the averments made in the writ petition become furnished by the UGC. Moreover, no appeal till date has been preferred by the UGC against the decision passed by this Court in Karamjeet Kaur's case (supra), wherebys, conclusivity is acquired to the said verdict, especially appertaining to the recognition of degrees obtained by the employees concerned but with prescription therein of a cut off date, prescription whereof for reasons assigned hereafter is untenable.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State Of Punjab And Others vs Sukhwinder Singh on 9 April, 2025

16. Even otherwise the said arguments looses its vigor on the trite factum, that in various writ petition(s) i.e. LPA No.465, 503, 521 17 of 39 ::: Downloaded on - 15-04-2025 07:36:28 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:050005-DB LPA-1843-2019 and connected cases -18- and 529 of 2021) the University Grants Commission, was impleaded as a party and after notice being issued to the University Grants Commission, though an appearance was made on behalf of the University Grants Commission, but yet subsequently no reply to the averments made in the writ petition become furnished by the UGC. Moreover, no appeal till date has been preferred by the UGC against the decision passed by this Court in Karamjeet Kaur's case (supra), wherebys, conclusivity is acquired to the said verdict, especially appertaining to the recognition of degrees obtained by the employees concerned but with prescription therein of a cut off date, prescription whereof for reasons assigned hereafter is untenable.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State Of Punjab And Others vs Talwinder Singh Butter And Others on 9 April, 2025

16. Even otherwise the said arguments looses its vigor on the trite factum, that in various writ petition(s) i.e. LPA No.465, 503, 521 17 of 39 ::: Downloaded on - 15-04-2025 07:37:34 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:050005-DB LPA-1843-2019 and connected cases -18- and 529 of 2021) the University Grants Commission, was impleaded as a party and after notice being issued to the University Grants Commission, though an appearance was made on behalf of the University Grants Commission, but yet subsequently no reply to the averments made in the writ petition become furnished by the UGC. Moreover, no appeal till date has been preferred by the UGC against the decision passed by this Court in Karamjeet Kaur's case (supra), wherebys, conclusivity is acquired to the said verdict, especially appertaining to the recognition of degrees obtained by the employees concerned but with prescription therein of a cut off date, prescription whereof for reasons assigned hereafter is untenable.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Subordinate Services Selection Board, ... vs Sandeep Singh Kaura on 9 April, 2025

16. Even otherwise the said arguments looses its vigor on the trite factum, that in various writ petition(s) i.e. LPA No.465, 503, 521 17 of 39 ::: Downloaded on - 15-04-2025 07:38:13 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:050005-DB LPA-1843-2019 and connected cases -18- and 529 of 2021) the University Grants Commission, was impleaded as a party and after notice being issued to the University Grants Commission, though an appearance was made on behalf of the University Grants Commission, but yet subsequently no reply to the averments made in the writ petition become furnished by the UGC. Moreover, no appeal till date has been preferred by the UGC against the decision passed by this Court in Karamjeet Kaur's case (supra), wherebys, conclusivity is acquired to the said verdict, especially appertaining to the recognition of degrees obtained by the employees concerned but with prescription therein of a cut off date, prescription whereof for reasons assigned hereafter is untenable.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ranjit Kaur vs State Of Punjab And Others on 9 April, 2025

16. Even otherwise the said arguments looses its vigor on the trite factum, that in various writ petition(s) i.e. LPA No.465, 503, 521 17 of 39 ::: Downloaded on - 15-04-2025 07:39:11 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:050005-DB LPA-1843-2019 and connected cases -18- and 529 of 2021) the University Grants Commission, was impleaded as a party and after notice being issued to the University Grants Commission, though an appearance was made on behalf of the University Grants Commission, but yet subsequently no reply to the averments made in the writ petition become furnished by the UGC. Moreover, no appeal till date has been preferred by the UGC against the decision passed by this Court in Karamjeet Kaur's case (supra), wherebys, conclusivity is acquired to the said verdict, especially appertaining to the recognition of degrees obtained by the employees concerned but with prescription therein of a cut off date, prescription whereof for reasons assigned hereafter is untenable.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next