Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 32 (0.96 seconds)
Documents citing Jamia Millia Islamia vs Sh. Ikramuddin on 22 November, 2011

Mrityunjay Kumar vs Land And Development Office on 12 September, 2019

Furthermore, the Commission observed that the issues raised in the RTI application pertained to the larger public interest and hence the same should be answered in accordance with the provisions of the Act. Moreover, since the allotment of land on lease was made long back by the Respondent Public Authority there appears no justification to keep it secret at this stage. The Commission finds that the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Jamia Millia Islamia v. Ikramuddin WP (C) No. 5677/2011 dated 22.11.2011, is pertinent in this matter wherein it was observed that:
Central Information Commission Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shakeel Ahmed Shaikh vs Western Railway Mumbai on 26 November, 2019

5. This Commission observed that the tender process is already over and hence, disclosing the name of the successful bidder company and final numerical figure of the bid price is on a much wider perspective which cannot be equated with the commercial interest of the successful bidder and therefore, every public has a right to know the same to encourage greater transparency. Also, no harm would be caused in disclosing the outcome of the tender committee report after severing the personal details of the third party(s). It is pertinent to mention the legal principle enunciated by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in its judgment dated 22-11-2011 in W.P.(C.) No. 5677/2011 tilted as Jamia Millia Islamia v. Sh. Ikramuddin, wherein, it was observed as follows:-
Central Information Commission Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - N K Gupta - Full Document

Rajan Gupta vs Delhi Development Authority on 24 January, 2020

Furthermore, the Commission observed that the issues raised in the RTI application pertained to the larger public interest and hence the same should be answered in accordance with the provisions of Page 2 of 8 the Act. Moreover, since the allotment of land on lease was made long back by the Respondent Public Authority there appears no justification to keep it secret at this stage. The Commission finds that the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Jamia Millia Islamia v. Ikramuddin WP (C) No. 5677/2011 dated 22.11.2011, is pertinent in this matter wherein it was observed that:
Central Information Commission Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Santosh Kumar Sahu vs Land And Development Office on 15 February, 2022

The Commission also observed that the issues raised in the RTI application pertained to the larger public interest and hence should be answered in accordance with the provisions of the Act. Moreover, since the allotment of land on lease was made long back by the Respondent Public Authority there appears no justification to keep it secret at this stage. The Commission finds that the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Jamia Millia Islamia v. Ikramuddin WP (C) No. 5677/2011 dated 22.11.2011, is pertinent in this matter wherein it was observed that:
Central Information Commission Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - H Samariya - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next