Tulla vs . Uoi on 9 September, 2014
In Ram Prakash Aggarwal & others Vs Gopi Krishan through Lrs 2013
LAC No. 07/2011 Page 14 of 26
Tulla vs. UOI
SCCR 537, it was held to the extent that a person feeling aggrieved may
make an application before Land Acquisition Collector for reference under
section 18 or 30 of the Act, but he cannot make an application for
impleadment or apportionment before the Reference Court. The Land
Acquisition Collector has not deposited any amount in court for
apportionment under section 30/31 of the Act to be apportionment
amongst the interested persons. Therefore, it is a reference petition under
section 18 of the Act. However, since the petitioner has been shown non
occupancy tenant having onefourth share in some part of land, for that
purposes, he interest and share is to be determined and reference is to be
answered. With this findings, now the formal issues are taken.
Issue No. 1
Whether the petitioner has any right, title or interest in the acquired
disputed land ? If so, to what extent and share ?