Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 49 (1.03 seconds)
Documents citing Kusum Lata Yadav vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 25 July, 2022

Shyam Pyari vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 30 October, 2023

5. Considering the facts and circumstances, without adverting on merits, we dispose of the writ petition asking the District Magistrate/District Election Officer, Prayagraj to decide the claim of the petitioner as per law but certainly in the light of the judgement dated 25.07.2022 in Writ-C No.28249 of 2021 (Kusum Lata Yadav vs. State of U.P. and 4 others) expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - M C Tripathi - Full Document

Kumari Priyanka And Another vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 18 August, 2022

9. The Order dated 14.06.2022 is set aside. The petitioners shall make a fresh representation annexing therewith a copy of the judgment rendered by the Division Bench in Writ-C No.28249 of 2021: Kusum Lata Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and four others. The District Magistrate Lalitpur shall consider the duty that was performed by Late Raj Bahadur Singh as Booth Level Officer for revision of voter list and take an appropriate decision within a period of eight weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced before him.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Chandra - Full Document

Richa Verma vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chif Secy. Lko. ... on 9 August, 2023

Learned counsel for petitioner has also placed reliance on judgment rendered by Division Bench of this court in the case of Kusum Lata Yadav and others versus State of U.P. and others, writ C No. 28249 of 2021 wherein also this court has deprecated the yardstick of 30 days as indicated in the government order dated Ist June, 2021 primarily on the ground that provisions are beneficial in nature and full extent of such a beneficial provision is required to be granted.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - M Mathur - Full Document

Rama Shankar vs Smt. Aporva Dubey Distt. Magistrate, ... on 23 November, 2023

5. The last but one paragraph of the order dated 28.02.2023 (supra) clearly provides that "non-detection of a case as Covid positive cannot be read as a bar once it is undisputed that the death occurred within a period of 15 days from the date a public servant underwent training to carry out the election duties". In the present case, the petitioner has stated that the wife of the petitioner was also a public servant had underwent training to carry out the election duty and during such period, she infected and hospitalized where she died on the same date i.e. on 27.04.2021. The District Magistrate has stated in her order that the wife of the petitioner was admitted in the hospital at 6:50 a.m. on 27.04.2021 and she died during treatment on the same date at 11:45 a.m. It has been informed at the bar that the order passed in the case of Kusum Lata Yadav (supra) has attained finality.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R S Chauhan - Full Document

Bhishma Pitamah Pandey vs State Public Services Tribunal Lko. ... on 6 February, 2024

In support of his arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the judgment passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Krushnakant B. Parmar Vs Union of India and another, reported in AIR 2012 SC ( Supp) 42 and the judgments passed by this Court in the cases of Kusum V. State of U.P. & others reported in 2021 (1) ALJ 306, Shahin Akhtar V. State of U. P. reported in AIRONLINE 2019 All, 1214, Abdul Aleem Vs. State of U.P. AIRONLINE 2019 All 2585, S.C. Asthana V. State of U.P. AIRONLINE 2023 All 959 and Ram Pal Singh Vs. Director of Agriculture reported in 2012 (3)) LCD 843.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Digvendra Singh vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. ... on 12 March, 2024

8. Learned counsel for petitioner has also placed reliance on judgment rendered by Division Bench of this court in the case of Kusum Lata Yadav and others versus State of U.P. and others, writ C No. 28249 of 2021 wherein also this court has deprecated the yardstick of 30 days as indicated in the government order dated Ist June, 2021 primarily on the ground that provisions are beneficial in nature and full extent of such a beneficial provision is required to be granted.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - M Kumar - Full Document

Sukhoo Ram vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 29 August, 2022

In response to the objection taken by the learned Standing Counsel, the petitioner has invited our attention to a decision of a co-ordinate Bench of this Court dated July 25, 2022 in Writ-C No. 28249 of 2021 (Kusum Lata Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and four others) connected with several other petitions, wherein the Court had read down paragraph 12 of the Government Order dated June 1, 2021 so as to cover two situations; (a) where the death had occurred due to COVID-19 within a period of 30 days of election duty or/ and (b) where the person concerned was detected COVID-19 positive within 30 days of election duty though he may have died later.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - M Misra - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next