Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.37 seconds)

E.S.I.C vs Chamex on 21 December, 2010

NATIONAL SERVICE CENTRE AND PETROL PUMP Vs. E.S.I CORPORATION, (1983 LAB I.C. 412), (2) C.S. ANGRE Vs. STATE, (AIR 1965 RAJASTHAN 65), (3) TEGA INDIA LIMITED Vs. CCE, (2004) 2 SCC 727, (4) GUJARAT ELECTRICITY BOARD Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT, (1984 (1) GLR 51, (5) RAM NARAIN & CO. Vs UOI (under provisions of EPF Act),1972 GLR 189, (6) AMRI NARAN W/O NARAN KARA Vs. SAUKEM CO.OP. SOCIETY LTD. (under provisions of Workmen's Compensation Act), 1986 (2) GLR 1221 12.1.
Gujarat High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - H B Antani - Full Document

Ahmedabad-Iii vs Gujarat Ambuja Export Ltd on 14 July, 2021

He relies upon the decision of Hon'ble Tribunal in the case of Fair Exports (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs CCE 2003 (158) ELT 385 (Tri.) wherein the Tribunal has set aside the demand of excise duty raised by disallowing the benefit of exemption under Notification No. 8/97-CE after observing that the bones obtained as waste during the process of manufacture of boneless meat, it cannot be treated as finished product. The said decision stands affirmed by Hon'ble Supreme Court vide order reported at 2015 (321) ELT A274 (SC). 3.8 Without prejudice to the above submission, he also submits that clearance of oil is also covered under Serial No. 3 Notification No. 23/2003- CE dated 31.03.2003 as the condition NO. 3(iii) is not being violated by the Respondent. This is because raw oil and the De-oiled cakes are merely produced from the oil seeds. He submits that the present appeal filed by the department liable to be set aside.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1