Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.64 seconds)
Documents citing Devarapathi Pattabhi Ramaiah vs Daruhiri Lakshmi Presanna And Anr. on 3 September, 1997

Aitipamula Shivalingam & Anr. vs Aitipamula Chinna Narsamma on 21 January, 1998

5. During the course of hearing of this revision, Sri B. Prakasha Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioners has placed before us a recent decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Devarapalli Pattabhi Ramaiah v. Davuluri Lakshmi Prasanna, . Placing reliance on this decision, learned Counsel contended that at any stage, a party can examine himself/herself as a witness on his/her behalf by seeking necessary permission from the Court on a petition filed in this regard.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 3 - Cited by 4 - V B Rao - Full Document

Gadapa Shyamala And 2 Others vs Gadapa Rajender And 31 Others on 6 July, 2018

2. Initially, the present I.A. was dismissed by the Court below on 29.08.2017. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners preferred C.R.P.No.4626 of 2017 and this Court, allowed the said revision petition and remitted the matter to the Court below to dispose of the I.A. in accordance with law, keeping in mind, the law declared by the Division Bench of this Court in Devarapalli Pattabhi Ramaiah v. Devuluri Lakshmi Prasanna1. By virtue of the impugned order, the Court below, after considering the said ruling, dismissed the I.A. once again.
Telangana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gadapa Shyamala vs Gadapa Rajender on 6 July, 2018

2. Initially, the present I.A. was dismissed by the Court below on 29.08.2017. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners preferred C.R.P.No.4626 of 2017 and this Court, allowed the said revision petition and remitted the matter to the Court below to dispose of the I.A. in accordance with law, keeping in mind, the law declared by the Division Bench of this Court in Devarapalli Pattabhi Ramaiah v. Devuluri Lakshmi Prasanna1. By virtue of the impugned order, the Court below, after considering the said ruling, dismissed the I.A. once again.
Telangana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Karri Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy vs Karre Sree Lakshmi on 26 February, 2024

8. So far as the first submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is concerned, in the case of John Susheel Kale & Another vs. S. Devarajulu & Another1, this Court placing reliance on the Division Bench judgment in Devarapalli Pattabhi Ramaiah v. D. Lakshmi Prasanna and others2, held that the application under Order 18 Rule 3-A need not be filed prior to the examination of the third party as witness. The party to the suit can examine himself as a witness even if he makes an application after examination of some witnesses on his behalf and even if he has not sought such permission before commencement of examination of his witnesses. Consequently, I am of the view that subsequent to the examination of witness, the application can be filed at a later stage. On that aspect, the view taken by the trial Court is as per the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court, binding on this Court. In the first submission, this Court do not find force that before the examination of DW.2 the right of the party defendant No.3, should have been reserved for his examination as DW.3.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1