Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (1.12 seconds)
Documents citing U.P.S.R.T.C. Thru' Its Regional ... vs Mohd. Suhel And Another on 6 July, 2010

Suhel And 4 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 27 June, 2024

8. Thus in view of the well settled principle of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matters of Krishnappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka; 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 529, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat and another; 2017 9 SCC 641, B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana; 2003(4) SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Burea of Investigation and another; (2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 677, Gian Singh Vs. Stated of Punjab; (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab and another; (2014) Supreme Today 642, the proceedings of the Case No. 26055/2023 (State vs. Suhel & Others), arising out of Case Crime No. 361 of 2021, under Sections 147, 452, 427, 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station- Katghar, District- Moradabad, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Moradabad, are hereby quashed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - D Verma - Full Document

Amarpal vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 16 July, 2024

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that vehicle of the petitioner UP-12MA-2023 has been seized by the Police, which is a case property of Case Crime No.546 of 2023 (State v. Suhel), under Section 3/7 Essential Commodities Act, Police Station Sardhana District Meerut and the confiscation proceedings are pending before the Additional District Magistrate (Administration), Meerut.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mohd. Sohel vs Of on 2 June, 2016

10. Thus, taking holistic view of the matter and looking into all attending facts and circumstances, I find this case to be a fit case to exercise powers under Section 482 of the Code and accordingly, FIR No. 53 of 2014 dated 24.2.2014, registered at Police Station, Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P. under Sections 279, 337, 338 IPC and Section 187 of the Motor Vehicles Act and consequent proceedings arising out of the aforesaid FIR in Police Challan No. 161-I/14 registered as Criminal Case No. 193 of 2014 titled State of H.P. vs. Mohd. Sohel pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.1, Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P. against the petitioner, are quashed.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - T S Chauhan - Full Document

Suhel vs State Of U.P. on 18 September, 2023

2. This appeal arises out of the impugned judgement and order dated 15.9.2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 5, Barabanki in S.T. No. 555 of 2013 (State vs. Suhel & others), arising out of Case Crime No. 138  of 2013 under Section 302/34 of I.P.C., and Section 5 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908 P.S. Dariyabad, District - Barabanki and sentencing him to life imprisonment with fine of Rs.10,000/- under Section 302 I.P.C., in default of payment of fine, three months additional imprisonment and 10 years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.5000/- under Section 5 of Explosive Substances Act,  in default of payment of fine, one month additional imprisonment.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - P Diwaker - Full Document

Gajendra And Another vs State Of U.P. on 8 April, 2026

4. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that in Session Trial No.317 of 2023 (State Vs. Suhel and others) appellants have stood surety for accused Ahmad Sayeed and they have submitted surety bond to the tune of Rs.1,00,000/- each. During trial said accused Ahmad Sayeed did not appear before the trial Court, hence non-bailable warrants were issued against him and proceedings under Section 446 Cr.P.C. were initiated against the appellants/ sureties in pursuance of order dated 05.06.2025. Learned counsel submitted that meanwhile on 10.07.2025 the accused Ahmad Sayeed has surrendered before the trial Court and he was sent to jail and later he was granted bail but despite that the proceedings under Section 446 Cr.P.C. are being pursued against appellants. It was submitted that as the accused has already appeared before the trial Court, thus the impugned orders are liable to be quashed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - R B Singh - Full Document

Suhel Ansari vs State Of U.P. And Another on 28 June, 2022

The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the entire proceedings, charge-sheet dated 05.10.2021 as well as cognizance and summoning order dated 01.11.2021 in Sessions Trial No. 530 of 2021 (State Vs. Suhel Ansari) arising out of Case Crime No. 92 of 2021 under Sections- 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(2)(va) of S.C./S.T. (Amendment, 2015) Act, Police Station- Babhani, District- Sonbhadra, pending in the court of Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Sonbhadra.
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Siddharth - Full Document

Suhel vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And ... on 26 July, 2022

The present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 10570 of 2021, (State Vs. Suhel), arising out of Case Crime No. 0244 of 2019, under Sections 295-A, 505 (2) and 66-C of Information Technology Act, Police Station- Katra Bazar, District- Gonda, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate IInd, Gonda.
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S K Pachori - Full Document

Suhel Khan And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 28 August, 2023

3. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants- Suhel Khan, Shoyeb Khan, Jahan Aara and Mobin Khan with the prayer to allow the present application and quash the entire proceeding as well as charge-sheet dated 19.08.2022 & summoning order dated 20.12.2022 in Case No. 5788 of 2022 (State Vs. Suhel) arising out of Case Crime No. 0228 of 2022, under Sections 498-A, 323 I.P.C. and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Phoolpur, District Azamgarh, pending in the Court of Fast Track Court (Crime Against Women), District Azamgarh. It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to stay the further proceeding of the aforesaid case, during the pendency of present application.
Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - S Gopal - Full Document

Suhel And Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 15 February, 2024

2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Case No. 26055 of 2023 (State vs. Suhel and others), pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1st, Moradabad in pursuance of charge-sheet dated 14.9.2021 in Case Crime No. 361 of 2021, under Sections 147, 452, 427, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Katghar, District Moradabad cognizance order dated 4.6.2023 passed by A.C.J.M, New Court No.2, Moradabad, on the basis of compromise between the parties.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - V Varma - Full Document
1   2 Next