Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 59 (3.02 seconds)
Documents citing N.K. Prasada vs Government Of India And Ors on 12 April, 2004

The Secretary/Correspondent. St. ... vs Dr. S.Wilson And Ors. Etc. on 9 January, 2019

6. It is apparent that the Lecturers having been appointed by the incumbents who were not in fact competent to appoint but they have made the appointments illegally under interim order of the Court that was ultimately vacated by the High Court with strictures upon them. No useful purpose would be served by grant of opportunity of hearing to those who were so appointed by the persons who were in fact incompetent to appoint and have taken undue advantage of the Court’s order of status quo ante. The principles of natural justice cannot be put into a strait­jacket formula and that its application will depend upon the fact situation of each and every case as laid down by this Court in K.L. Tripathi v. State Bank of India, (1984) 1 SCC 43; N.K. Prasada v. Govt. of India, (2004) 6 SCC 299; State Bank of Punjab v. Jagir Singh, (2004) 8 SCC 129; Karnataka SRTC v. S.G. Kotturappa, (2005) 3 SCC 409 and Vivekanand Sethi v. Chairman, J&K Bank Ltd., (2005) 5 SCC 337.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 13 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

The Regional Director vs Http://Www.Judis.Nic.In on 22 April, 2019

The second proviso in sub-Section (6) of Section 45-IA of the RBI Act states that before making any order of cancellation of CoR, such company shall be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard. This expression has been subject matter of interpretation in several http://www.judis.nic.in 37 decisions, since the principles of natural justice is not a straight jacket formula as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in N.K.Prasada vs. Government of India reported in (2004) 6 SCC 299 and Union of India vs. Tulsiram Patel reported in (1985) 3 SCC 398.
Madras High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - T S Sivagnanam - Full Document

M/S. Jay Mahakali Chemical vs Deputy Environment Engineer (M.P ... on 10 September, 2020

5. It cannot be doubted that the principles of natural justice cannot be put into a strait-jacket formula and that its application will depend upon the fact situation obtaining therein. It cannot be applied in a vacuum without reference to the relevant facts and circumstances of the case. This is what has been held by the Supreme Court in K.L. Tripathi Vs. State Bank of India & Ors., AIR 1984 SC 273; N.K. Prasada Vs. Government of India & Ors., (2004) 6 SCC 299; State of Punjab Vs. Jagir Singh, (2004) 8 SCC 129; Karnataka SRTC & Anr. Vs. S.G. Kotturappa & Anr., (2005) 3 SCC 409; and in Viveka Nand Sethi Vs. Chairman, J&K Bank Ltd., (2005) 5 SCC 337.
National Green Tribunal Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sabarmati Majoor Kamdar Sahkari Mandli vs State Of Gujarat on 30 September, 2020

20. It is argued by the learned counsel that while passing the order impugned, no opportunity of hearing was given to the appellants and there is no compliance of principles of natural justice. It cannot be doubted that the principles of natural justice cannot be put into a strait-jacket formula and that its application will depend upon the fact situation obtaining therein. It cannot be applied in a vacuum without reference to the relevant facts and circumstances of the case. This is what has been held by the Supreme Court in K.L. Tripathi Vs. State Bank of India & Ors., AIR 1984 SC 273; N.K. Prasada Vs. Government of India & Ors., (2004) 6 SCC 299; State of Punjab Vs. Jagir Singh, (2004) 8 SCC 129; Karnataka SRTC & Anr. Vs. S.G. Kotturappa & Anr., (2005) 3 SCC 409; and in Viveka Nand Sethi Vs. Chairman, J&K Bank Ltd., (2005) 5 SCC 337.
National Green Tribunal Cites 85 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Surat Green Precast Pvt. Ltd vs Reliance Industries Ltd. & Ors on 5 October, 2020

58. It cannot be doubted that the principles of natural justice cannot be put into a strait-jacket formula and that its application will depend upon the fact situation obtaining therein. It cannot be applied in a vacuum without reference to the relevant facts and circumstances of the case. This is what has been held by the Supreme Court in K.L. Tripathi Vs. State Bank of India & Ors., AIR 1984 SC 273; N.K. Prasada Vs. Government of India & Ors., (2004) 6 SCC 299; State of Punjab Vs. Jagir Singh, (2004) 8 SCC 129; Karnataka SRTC & Anr. Vs. S.G. Kotturappa & Anr., (2005) 3 SCC 409; and in Viveka Nand Sethi Vs. Chairman, J&K Bank Ltd., (2005) 5 SCC 337.
National Green Tribunal Cites 110 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vinod Industries vs Rajasthan State Pollution Control ... on 21 December, 2021

44. It cannot be doubted that the principles of natural justice cannot be put into a strait-jacket formula and that its application will depend upon the fact situation obtaining therein. It cannot be applied in a vacuum without reference to the 65 relevant facts and circumstances of the case. This is what has been held by the Supreme Court in K.L. Tripathi Vs. State Bank of India &Ors., AIR 1984 SC 273; N.K. Prasada Vs. Government of India &Ors., (2004) 6 SCC 299; State of Punjab Vs. Jagir Singh, (2004) 8 SCC 129; Karnataka SRTC &Anr. Vs. S.G. Kotturappa&Anr., (2005) 3 SCC 409; and in VivekaNandSethi Vs. Chairman, J&K Bank Ltd., (2005) 5 SCC 337.
National Green Tribunal Cites 59 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Budhsen Rathour vs Union Of India on 9 March, 2022

45. It cannot be doubted that the principles of natural justice cannot be put into a strait-jacket formula and that its application will depend upon the fact situation obtaining therein. It cannot be applied in a vacuum without reference to the relevant facts and circumstances of the case. This is what has been held by the Supreme Court in K.L. Tripathi Vs. State Bank of India &Ors., AIR 1984 SC 273; N.K. Prasada Vs. Government of India &Ors., (2004) 6 SCC 299; State of Punjab Vs. Jagir Singh, (2004) 8 SCC 129; Karnataka SRTC &Anr. Vs. S.G. Kotturappa&Anr., (2005) 3 SCC 409; and in Viveka Nand Sethi Vs. Chairman, J&K Bank Ltd., (2005) 5 SCC 337.
National Green Tribunal Cites 93 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mr. Pedrito Misquitta vs The Member Secretary Goa Coastal Zone ... on 15 October, 2020

11. It cannot be doubted that the principles of natural justice cannot be put into a strait-jacket formula and that its application will depend upon the fact situation obtaining therein. It cannot be applied in a vacuum without reference to the relevant facts and circumstances of the case. This is what has been held by the Supreme Court in K.L. Tripathi Vs. State Bank of India & Ors., AIR 1984 SC 273; N.K. Prasada Vs. Government of India & Ors., (2004) 6 SCC 299; State of Punjab Vs. Jagir Singh, (2004) 8 SCC 129; Karnataka SRTC & Anr. Vs. S.G. Kotturappa & Anr., (2005) 3 SCC 409; and in Viveka Nand Sethi Vs. Chairman, J&K Bank Ltd., (2005) 5 SCC 337.
National Green Tribunal Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kandla Finance Limited vs Reserve Bank Of India on 23 September, 2022

"33.The next aspect to be considered is whether an opportunity of personal hearing ought to have been granted to the respondents before the order impugned in the writ petitions were passed. Admittedly, the respondents have not sought for any personal hearing and had they done so, in all probabilities, personal hearing would have been offered, in the light of the stand taken by the respondents in the counter affidavit in paragraph 33. However, we are to examine the statutory framework as to whether the statute mandates an opportunity of personal hearing. The second proviso in sub-Section (6) of Section 45-IA of the RBI Act states that before making any order of cancellation of CoR, such company shall be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard. This expression has been subject matter of interpretation in several http:// www.judis.nic.in decisions, since the principles of natural justice is not a straight jacket formula as Page 31 of 68 Downloaded on : Fri Sep 23 21:48:39 IST 2022 C/SCA/16918/2021 CAV JUDGMENT DATED: 23/09/2022 held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in N.K.Prasada vs. Government of India reported in (2004) 6 SCC 299 and Union of India vs. Tulsiram Patel reported in (1985) 3 SCC 398.
Gujarat High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - B D Karia - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next