Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.36 seconds)

Vijay Kumar Ojha vs Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. on 22 April, 2025

"12. Order VII, Rule of the Code of Civil Procedure empowers and enables a Court to return the plaint "at any stage of the suit" to be presented to the Court in which the suit ought to have been instituted. The words "at any stage of the suit" would mean even after the trial has begun and concluded but before the Judgment is delivered. Thus, while answering the question of law referred that neither consent nor waiver can cure the defect of inherent lack of jurisdiction and consent of parties cannot operate to confer jurisdiction on a Court which has no competence to try it, whereas territorial jurisdiction can always be assumed by the Court when such an objection is waived by the party on the principles as laid down in Section 21 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Independently of Section 21 of Code of Civil Procedure defendant may also waive the objection as regards defect in territorial jurisdiction and will be subsequently precluded from taking the objection."
Delhi High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - M P Arora - Full Document

Shri Shyam Sunder Kalra vs Shri Ravinder Kumar Jain & Anr. on 17 October, 2012

11. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has placed reliance upon a Division Bench judgment of Andhra Pradesh in Bank of India Vs. U.A.N. Raju and Anr. 2004(1) ALD 577 to argue that parties cannot confer jurisdiction on the Court which does not have any. There is no dispute to the aforesaid proposition of law and which is referred to in the said judgment qua the inherent or the subject matter jurisdiction.
Delhi High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - V J Mehta - Full Document
1