Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.29 seconds)

Income-Tax Officer vs Ajay Sanjay (Huf) on 29 May, 1989

Further according to the Madras High Court in the case of T.U.S.C. Ltd. v. CIT 126 ITR 125, no appeal lies from the order of the ITO refusing interest due to the assessee under Section 214 and the appeal would lie only as part of appeal against assessment itself. The proper remedy of the assessee in such case is to file revision to Commissioner. Since the sum and substance of the present appeal is ITO's refusal to grant interest under Section 214 the appeal cannot be entertained in law since Section 246 of the IT. Act does not provide for an appeal from an order of the ITO determining the interest payable by the Government or by the assessee under Section 214 or Section 215 or Section 217. In view of the above reasons, the appeal is rejected.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 9 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Udhoji Shri Kishan Das on 15 September, 1994

9. There is conflict of opinion among the various High Courts in regard to this controversy. The High Courts of Gujarat, Calcutta, Madras and Rajasthan have taken the view expressed by us. (See Bardolia Textile Mills v. I.T.O. Circle II, Surat, 151 ITR 389 Guj; Chloride India Ltd. v. CIT, West Bengal, 106 ITR 38 Cal; T.U.S.C. Ltd. v. C.I.T., 126 ITR 125 Mad.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 2 - U Bhat - Full Document
1