Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.32 seconds)
Documents citing M/S Heidelberg Cement India Limited vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... on 8 September, 2016

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited vs Bangalore-Iii on 16 October, 2024

➢ M/s Ericsson India Pvt Ltd v. CCE, Jaipur - 2019 (3) TMI 776-CESTAT New Delhi ➢ M/s. Hewlett Packard India Sales Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Commissioner Of Service Tax, LTU, BENGALURU - 2024 (8) TMI 718 - CESTAT BANGALORE ➢ Avo Carbon India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner Of CGST & Central Excise, Chennai - 2024 (8) TMI 1205 - CESTAT CHENNAI ➢ PSL Limited vs. Commissioner of C.E. & S.T. -Rajkot - 2024 (7) TMI 376 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD ➢ M/s. GKN Driveline (India) Ltd. vs. CCE, Delhi-III - 2023 (9) TMI 1131 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH ➢ Heidelberg Cement India Ltd. vs. Commissioner Of Central Excise Bangalore - 2017 (6) TMI 264 - CESTAT BANGALORE Page 3 of 8 E/27087/2013 3.3. He further submits that the demand was confirmed in the impugned order invoking extended period of limitation which cannot be sustained as the appellant has not suppressed any facts from the Department and the partial written off of the value has been disclosed in the balance sheet.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Indian Telephone Industries Ltd vs Bangalore-I on 4 March, 2024

In the case of Cement Corporation of India (supra) relied upon by the Revenue, it has been categorically held that the appellant's sale price of cement was inclusive of Excise duty and the gate passes had very clearly showed that Excise duty was being charged and in the absence of any contrary evidence, the question of not passing on the duty was not coming forth. On the contrary, in the instant case, no such evidence has been placed before us.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Dwarikesh Sugar Industries Ltd vs Commr. Of Central Excise & S.T., Meerut ... on 23 November, 2017

2. I find that an identical issue was considered by the Tribunal in the case of Heidelberg Cement India Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Central Excise, Bangalore I reported in 2017 (47) STR 98 (Tri.-Bang.), wherein the consultancy services used for greenhouse gas emission reduction and Carbon Credit Management Services were held to be cenvatable.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1