Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 53 (0.40 seconds)
Documents citing Ravinder Pal Singh & Anr vs State Of Punjab on 29 November, 2002

Ravinder Pal Singh vs The State on 2 May, 2017

10.The   appellant/accused   is   also   convicted   for   the   offence punishable under Section 411 IPC on the allegations that stolen motorcycle was recovered from the possession of the accused during vehicle checking at Shahpura, near CRPF Camp, Main Road, Tilak Nagar, Delhi on 04.04.2012.   The prosecution to prove   its   case   has   examined   recovery   witnesses   of   the motorcycle i.e. PW4 Ct. Vikram Ditya, PW5 Ct. Anil Kumar and PW7 SI Joginder Singh.  All the three police officials have deposed about the recovery of the stolen motorcycle from the possession   of   the   accused   on   04.04.2012   during   police checking.     All   the   three   police   officials   stood   test   of   cross examination   and   during   their   lengthy   cross   examination CA No. 54408/2016         Ravinder Pal Singh Vs. State 7 of 12 nothing   material   is   extracted   to   make   their   testimony unreliable.  The minor contradictions emerged in the testimony of the police officials are bound to happen.   The case of the prosecution   could  not   be  thrown  away   merely  on   the   minor contradictions   in   the   testimony   of   the   witnesses.     To   raise shadow   of   doubt   about   the   story   of   the   prosecution,   the contradiction should be material, which goes to the roots of the case.  The material contradictions relating to the facts in dispute is considered just to create shadow of the doubt about the story of  the  prosecution.     In  the  present   case,   the  counsel   for   the appellant/accused   could   not   point   out   any   material contradictions regarding facts in issue.
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ravinder Pal vs The State (Nct Of Delhi) on 6 September, 2012

1. Vide this judgment, I shall dispose of this appeal u/s 374(3) CrPC filed by the appellant/convict against the impugned judgment and order on sentence dated 1.8.2012 passed by Sh. Santosh Kumar Singh, Ld. Metropolitan Magistrate (Traffic­1), South­West District, Dwarka Courts, Delhi, whereby the appellant/convict was sentenced u/s 185 Motor Vehicle Act with simple imprisonment of 20 days and fine of Rs. 2,000/­, u/s 3/181 Motor Vehicle Act with fine of Rs. 500/­ and u/s 17/177 Motor Vehicle Act with fine of Rs. CA No. 23/12. Ravinder Pal Vs. State. Page No. 1 of 4.
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dps Kohli vs State (Through Public Prosecutor) on 8 October, 2012

In case law 1993 JCC 219 titled Ravinder Pal Singh Vs. State it has been stated in the head note that:­ 'Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sec.439, 219 - Surety for different offences, committed within a year - Contention that all the offences alleged to have been committed within one year - Therefore instead of furnishing 3 sureties, the petitioner should be directed to furnish one surety - Accused be released on bail on furnishing P.B.'s in each case with one surety for all the three cases'.
Delhi District Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Makhan Singh vs State Of Punjab on 22 December, 2011

IInd petition (CRM-M-36231 of 2011 titled as "Harsimrandeep Singh Vs. The State of Punjab"), IIIrd petition ("Sukhwinder Singh @ D.C. Vs. State of Punjab") and IVth petition ("Ravinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab") are hereby allowed and the petitioners in the said petitions, who were in custody, are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate .
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - R K Jain - Full Document

(Pc No. 494/06) (Rajinder Pal Singh vs . State) on 26 November, 2007

Shri Harvinder Pal Singh was produced before the learned District Judge. As per order dated 19.6.2007 of the learned District Judge, Sh. Harvinder Pal Singh informed the court that he is being treated properly by his brothers Amarjeet Singh and Rajinder Pal Singh. He has showed his disinclination to live with Tarvinder Pal Singh. Shri Amarjeet Singh has no objection in case he is appointed as guardian (PC No. 494/06) (Rajinder Pal Singh vs. State) : 3: ad-litem of Harvinder Pal Singh in this case. He is the real brother of Harvinder Pal Singh. Considering the totality of the fact and circumstances, I deem it appropriate to allow the application filed by the petitioner under Order 32 CPC and thereby appoint Shri Amarjeet Singh Maini as guardian ad-litem of Harvinder Pal Singh.
Delhi District Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Hansa Singh vs State Of Punjab on 2 July, 2020

9. The learned State counsel has also argued that challan against the petitioner had been presented on 24.02.2020 i.e. before decision of his bail application. Thus, the petitioner was not entitled to claim benefit of the proviso to Section 167 (2) Cr.P.C. This argument is being noticed only to be rejected. The language of the proviso to Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. is clear. It bars a Magistrate from remanding an accused to custody in excess of 90 days in cases punishable with death, imprisonment with life or imprisonment upto 10 years. Thus, if a challan is not presented within the said period, the accused gets an indefeasible right to bail which cannot be defeated by filing the challan after 90 days but before the release of an accused on bail. I am supported in this view by the judgment of Ravinder Singh (supra) which has itself relied upon a judgment of the Supreme Court in Uday Mohanlal Acharya vs. State of Maharashtra, 2001(2) RCR (Criminal) 452. Consequently, this argument of the learned State is also rejected.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - S Mittal - Full Document

Gurpreet Singh And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Others on 14 December, 2020

Again following the Division Bench judgment in Jaskaran Singh's case (supra), another Division Bench of this Court while deciding CWP No. 15133 of 2002, titled as Ravinder Singh Vs. The State of Punjab, on 09.12.2002, held that the seats in the open general category are to be filled up first without reference to the reservation in any manner. The relevant paragraphs 4 and 5 are as under :-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 1 - H S Sethi - Full Document

Satpal vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 4 November, 2022

Reference is further made to Ravinder Pal Singh Vs. The State of Punjab 2008(2) RCR (Criminal) 47, it is observed that to prove the abetment for commission of suicide, it is to be proved that the words of gestures used by the accused so as to bring the person abetted, to such a stage and under such circumstances that he could think nothing more except to end his life and compelled by the circumstances to such an extent that he could do nothing else but to end his life.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next