Pardhanani Chatrabhuj Bassarmal vs M/S Omr Investment Llp on 28 July, 2023
10. The same view was thereafter upheld in V.C.
Shukla v. State Through C.B.I., reported in 1980 Supp SCC
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (2.79 seconds)Documents citing
V C Ram Mohan vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 20 August, 2019
Dr.Shivamurthy Murugha Sharanaru vs State Of Karnataka on 11 March, 2024
(Emphasis supplied)
The Apex Court holds that there is some significance in the duty
cast upon the concerned Court while framing charges. The purpose
of framing a charge, as held by the Apex Court, is to intimate to the
accused, clear and unambiguous and precise nature of accusation
that the accused is called upon to meet in the course of trial. This is
63
in fact what is held by the Apex Court in V.C.SHUKLA (supra).
Dr. Shivamurthy Murugha Sharanaru vs State Of Karnataka on 11 March, 2024
(Emphasis supplied)
The Apex Court holds that there is some significance in the duty
cast upon the concerned Court while framing charges. The purpose
of framing a charge, as held by the Apex Court, is to intimate to the
accused, clear and unambiguous and precise nature of accusation
that the accused is called upon to meet in the course of trial. This is
63
in fact what is held by the Apex Court in V.C.SHUKLA (supra).
Sri Shashikumar vs Assistant Director on 14 September, 2022
8. Reference being made to the judgment of the Apex
Court in the case of V.C.SHUKLA VS. STATE THROUGH
C.B.I1, the circumstances, becomes apposite.
1980 Supp Supreme Court Cases 921
1