Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.24 seconds)

Chief Engineer, Irrigation Vibhag ... vs Sadaram Muka Sahare on 31 October, 2014

Similar view has again been taken by the same learned judge in Chima Shravan Shinde (supra). It is thus, beyond doubt that the question as regards entitlement of a workman to relief under provisions of Section 33-C(2) of the said Act on the basis of Clause 28 of the Kalelkar Award stands answered in favour of the respondents - workmen. The Labour Court, therefore, had jurisdiction to consider Clause 28 of the Kalelkar Award while determining the entitlement of the workman to relief under provisions of Section 33-C(2) of the said Act.

Executive Eng Kukadi Project Land Deve vs Pandharinath Bhau Tarte on 1 April, 2016

(i) State of Maharashtra Vs. M.V.Ghalge - 1991 (2) Mh. L.J. 1557, (ii) Chima Shravan Shinde and others Vs. M.V.Patil and others - Writ Petition No.120 of 1981, dated 15.7.1994, (iii) Director, Fisheries Termination Division Vs. Bhikubhai Meghajibhai Cavda - 2010 AIR SCW 542, (iv) Harjinder Singh Vs. Punjab State Warehousing Corporation - 2010 (124) FLR 700 and (v) Anop Sharma Vs. Executive Engineer, Public Health Division- 2010 (2) Bom. L.C. 231 (SC).
Bombay High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - R V Ghuge - Full Document
1