Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.38 seconds)

Rajendra Kumar vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Others on 6 July, 2018

10. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner placed his reliance in support of his argument with regard to the competence of the forest guard to initiate the proceeding of the seizure on the judgment passed by the Hon'ble High Court in the matter of Bhagwan Khushwaha & Another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Another dated 27.07.2017 in WPC No.6612 of 2007 wherein the Hon'ble High Court while considering the judgment of Bahadur Singh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others reported in 2015 (2) M.P.H.T. 97 (CG) held that the 5 forest guard was incompetent to search and seize the article including wooden logs and vehicle which gave rise to initiation of confiscation proceedings and held the confiscation proceedings to be vitiated.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - P P Sahu - Full Document

Vigan Prasad vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 24 November, 2017

(5) In view of above factual position, the matter is remitted back to the Excise Commissioner, Raipur, who will consider and decide the matter afresh in light of decision rendered by this Court in the matter of Amit Kumar Jaiswal (supra) expeditioulsy preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order after affording due opportunity of hearing to both the parties and pass reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law. (6) The writ petitions are allowed to the extent indicated hereinabove.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Agrawal - Full Document
1