Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 144 (1.15 seconds)
Documents citing Pramod Kumar Sharma (Deceased) Thr Lrs vs Pradeep Kumar Sharma on 2 February, 2022

Ram Kishan Gupta vs Tirupati Translogistics Pvt Ltd And ... on 8 October, 2025

4. On going through the above mentioned pronouncement of the Apex Court, it is clear that an appeal against an order of acquittal in a proceeding under Section 138 of the N. I. Act preferred by the complainant squarely falls within the ambit of proviso to Section 372 of Cr.P.C. Similar observations have been made by this Court in Satish Kumar vs. Jugal Kishore, CRM-A-2700-MA-2018 and Ajmer Kundu (deceased) through LRs vs. Pardeep Sharma, CRM-A-481-2022, vide orders dated 02.07.2025 and in Raj Kumar vs. Rajender, CRM-A-826-2025(O&M) vide order dated 07.07.2025.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Harpal Singh Bedi vs State Of Punjab And Others on 8 October, 2025

4. On going through the above mentioned pronouncement of the Apex Court, it is clear that an appeal against an order of acquittal preferred by the complainant squarely falls within the ambit of proviso to Section 372 of Cr.P.C. Similar observations have been made by this Court in Satish Kumar vs. Jugal Kishore, CRM-A-2700-MA-2018 and Ajmer Kundu (deceased) through LRs vs. Pardeep Sharma, CRM-A-481-2022, vide orders dated 02.07.2025 and in Raj Kumar vs. Rajender, CRM-A-826-2025(O&M) vide order dated 07.07.2025.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Distt. Appropriate Authority Cum ... vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 8 October, 2025

4. On going through the above mentioned pronouncement of the Apex Court, it is clear that an appeal against an order of acquittal preferred by the complainant squarely falls within the ambit of proviso to Section 372 of Cr.P.C. Similar observations have been made by this Court in Satish Kumar vs. Jugal Kishore, CRM-A-2700-MA-2018 and Ajmer Kundu (deceased) through LRs vs. Pardeep Sharma, CRM-A-481-2022, vide orders dated 02.07.2025 and in Raj Kumar vs. Rajender, CRM-A-826-2025(O&M) vide order dated 07.07.2025.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jarnail Singh vs Harshit on 9 October, 2025

4. On going through the above mentioned pronouncement of the Apex Court, it is clear that an appeal against an order of acquittal in a proceeding under Section 138 of the N. I. Act preferred by the complainant squarely falls within the ambit of proviso to Section 372 of Cr.P.C. Similar observations have been made by this Court in Satish Kumar vs. Jugal Kishore, CRM-A-2700-MA-2018 and Ajmer Kundu (deceased) through LRs vs. Pardeep Sharma, CRM-A-481-2022, vide orders dated 02.07.2025 and in Raj Kumar vs. Rajender, CRM-A-826-2025(O&M) vide order dated 07.07.2025.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Shiv Narain Periwal And Sons Pvt Ltd ... vs Vikas Kumar on 9 October, 2025

4. On going through the above mentioned pronouncement of the Apex Court, it is clear that an appeal against an order of acquittal in a proceeding under Section 138 of the N. I. Act preferred by the complainant squarely falls within the ambit of proviso to Section 372 of Cr.P.C. Similar observations have been made by this Court in Satish Kumar vs. Jugal Kishore, CRM-A-2700-MA-2018 and Ajmer Kundu (deceased) through LRs vs. Pardeep Sharma, CRM-A-481-2022, vide orders dated 02.07.2025 and in Raj Kumar vs. Rajender, CRM-A-826-2025(O&M) vide order dated 07.07.2025.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Om Cement Store vs Pardeep on 13 October, 2025

4. On going through the above mentioned pronouncement of the Apex Court, it is clear that an appeal against an order of acquittal in a proceeding under Section 138 of the N. I. Act preferred by the complainant squarely falls within the ambit of proviso to Section 372 of Cr.P.C. Similar observations have been made by this Court in Satish Kumar vs. Jugal Kishore, CRM-A-2700-MA-2018 and Ajmer Kundu (deceased) through LRs vs. Pardeep Sharma, CRM-A-481-2022, vide orders dated 02.07.2025 and in Raj Kumar vs. Rajender, CRM-A-826-2025(O&M) vide order dated 07.07.2025.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Sree Ramcides Chemicals Pvt Ltd vs Praveen Aggarwal on 13 October, 2025

4. On going through the above mentioned pronouncement of the Apex Court, it is clear that an appeal against an order of acquittal in a proceeding under Section 138 of the N. I. Act preferred by the complainant squarely falls within the ambit of proviso to Section 372 of Cr.P.C. Similar observations have been made by this Court in Satish Kumar vs. Jugal Kishore, CRM-A-2700-MA-2018 and Ajmer Kundu (deceased) through LRs vs. Pardeep Sharma, CRM-A-481-2022, vide orders dated 02.07.2025 and in Raj Kumar vs. Rajender, CRM-A-826-2025(O&M) vide order dated 07.07.2025.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next