citedby: 12565578

Anil @ Hunny vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 28 April, 2017

In the case of Rampal Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported at 2012 (8) SCC 289, the Hon'ble Supreme Court altered the conviction of the accused from Section 302 to 304 Part I of IPC and awarded a sentence of 10 year rigorous imprisonment. Relevant para 25 and 30 read as under:

Delhi High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 4 - G S Sistani - Full Document

Pradeep & Anr. vs The State Of M.P on 30 October, 2017

26. Hon'ble Apex Court in case law Rampal Singh (supra) in para 22 further observed that:-

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 2 - A Shrivastava - Full Document

Pappu @ Sohanvir vs State Of U.P. on 21 June, 2022

48. Referring to an earlier decision in Mohinder Pal Jolly vs. State of Punjab11, it was noted in Rampal Singh (supra) that the distinction between two parts of Section 304 has been stated with some clarity therein which reads as under:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Amar Pal Maurya vs State Of U.P. on 17 May, 2018

In the case of Rampal Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in (2012) 8 Supreme Court Cases 289, Hon'ble the Apex Court has considered the legal aspect as to when culpable homicide would amount to murder and when it would not amount to murder. Hon'ble the Apex Court has held in paragraph no. 22 as under:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Venkatesh vs State Of Karnataka By on 26 August, 2020

59. The Hon'ble Supreme Court, while considering the provisions of Sections 299, 300, 302 and 304 of the Indian Penal Code, in the case of Rampal Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in (2012)8 SCC 289 at paragraph 11, 14, 29 and 30 held as under:

Karnataka High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - B Veerappa - Full Document

Radhey Shyam And Another vs State Of U.P. on 20 August, 2018

In the case of Rampal Singh Vs. State of U.P. (supra) the Supreme Court has again considered the distinction between Section 299 and Section 300 of the Code and has opined as under:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 1 - R R Awasthi - Full Document

State vs Raman @ Ravan @ Pramod on 6 January, 2018

[Rampal Singh Vs. State of U.P. 2012 Crl. L.J. 3764.]

Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mahendrabhai Somabhai Vasava vs State Of Gujarat on 28 November, 2025

20. This Court in the aforesaid case of Rampal Singh (supra) further explained the difference between these two offences from the perspective of the punitive provisions of Sections 302 and 304 IPC by grading the offences in three categories as follows:

Gujarat High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - I J Vora - Full Document

Mahendrabhai Naginbhai Vasava vs State Of Gujarat on 5 December, 2025

20. This Court in the aforesaid case of Rampal Singh (supra) further explained the difference between these two offences from the perspective of the punitive provisions of Sections 302 and 304 IPC by grading the offences in three categories as follows:

Gujarat High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - I J Vora - Full Document

Jitan Bora vs The State on 18 March, 2026

In support of the aforesaid proposition and to convert the conviction from Section 302 to Section 304 Part I IPC in Budhi Singh, the Court also relied upon Rampal Singh v. State of U.P..

Delhi High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - N Chawla - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results