Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.78 seconds)
Documents citing Sh. Aditya Gupta vs Sh. Narender Gupta & Ors. on 24 February, 2023

Balasaheb Patil vs Smt. Soni @ Sonia Patil on 12 July, 2024

designed to protect the rights and dignity of senior citizens, ensuring they can live a peaceful and secure life. The Act empowers tribunals to order the eviction of children or relatives who fail to maintain their parents. This protection is paramount, particularly in cases where the senior citizen's right to maintenance and peaceful living is at stake, as emphasized in Aditya Gupta v. Narendra Gupta (supra) and Manmohan Singh v. UT Chandigarh(supra).
Karnataka High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Basanagouda vs Smt. Soni @ Sonia Patil on 12 July, 2024

designed to protect the rights and dignity of senior citizens, ensuring they can live a peaceful and secure life. The Act empowers tribunals to order the eviction of children or relatives who fail to maintain their parents. This protection is paramount, particularly in cases where the senior citizen's right to maintenance and peaceful living is at stake, as emphasized in Aditya Gupta v. Narendra Gupta (supra) and Manmohan Singh v. UT Chandigarh(supra).
Karnataka High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Sony @Sonia Patil vs The Assistant Commissioner on 12 July, 2024

designed to protect the rights and dignity of senior citizens, ensuring they can live a peaceful and secure life. The Act empowers tribunals to order the eviction of children or relatives who fail to maintain their parents. This protection is paramount, particularly in cases where the senior citizen's right to maintenance and peaceful living is at stake, as emphasized in Aditya Gupta v. Narendra Gupta (supra) and Manmohan Singh v. UT Chandigarh(supra).
Karnataka High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri Anil Kumar vs The Assistant Commissioner on 12 July, 2024

designed to protect the rights and dignity of senior citizens, ensuring they can live a peaceful and secure life. The Act empowers tribunals to order the eviction of children or relatives who fail to maintain their parents. This protection is paramount, particularly in cases where the senior citizen's right to maintenance and peaceful living is at stake, as emphasized in Aditya Gupta v. Narendra Gupta (supra) and Manmohan Singh v. UT Chandigarh(supra).
Karnataka High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Village Pul Prahladpur Jan Kalyan ... vs State on 24 January, 2024

5. A complaint u/s. 200 Cr.PC was filed by the complainant i.e. petitioner herein against the unauthorized construction for taking cognizance under relevant provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1948 read with provisions of IPC, Environment Protection Act, Municipal Corporation Act, Delhi Police Act. Vide order dated 12.12.2011 FIR was directed to be registered by the Ld. Magistrate with direction to carry the investigation in a fair manner and to conclude the same as expeditiously as possible. Consequently FIR bearing no. 394/2011 was registered at PS Pul Prahaldpur u/s. 406/420/466/467/468/471/120-B/34 IPC. The order was challenged before the Hon'ble High Court by respondents no. 3 Sh. Vikas Anand, respondent no. 4 Sh. Naveen Verma, respondent no. 5 Sh. Harinder Singh, respondent no. 6 Sh. Naveen Garg, respondent no. 7 Sh. B. S. Meena, respondent no. 8 Sh. V. S. Gupta and respondent no. 9 Sh. S. K. Meena and all are the officials of MCD. The Hon'ble High Court vide order dated 03.12.2012 set aside the order dated 12.12.2011 qua the aforesaid respondents and subsequent proceedings emanating thereto was also set aside. It was on the basis of order passed by Hon'ble High Court did the IO filed the closure report which was accepted by the impugned order 30.05.2013. The concluding para of the closure report states that "Since from the direction of the High Court of Delhi the Order of the Ld. MM dated 12.12.2011 has been quashed/ set aside, hence the investigation proceeding cannot be initiated against the alleged persons. So the cancellation report has been prepared in the case and is being filed in the Hon'ble Court ". Noting that order, the then Ld. CMM dispensed with the attendance of complainant and accepted the closure report. However the order also noted that Crl.
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1