Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.80 seconds)
Documents citing Dubaria vs Har Prasad & Anr on 10 September, 2008

U.Sree vs U.Srinivas on 11 December, 2012

In Dubaria v. Har Prasad and Another[27], it has been held that when there is infirmity in the decision because of excluding, ignoring and overlooking the abundant materials and the evidence, if considered in proper perspective, would have led to conclusion contrary to the one taken by both the High Court as well as the fora below, it would be open to this Court to interfere with the concurrent findings of fact.
Supreme Court of India Cites 34 - Cited by 187 - D Misra - Full Document

Ramjan Baksh vs Nagar Palika Chaksu on 21 June, 2012

In support of his submissions, learned counsel for the appellant relied upon the cases of Rame Gowda (Dead) By Lrs. Vs. M.Vardappa Naidu (Dead) by Lrs. & another reported in (2004) 1 SCC 769, P.Chandrasekharan & another Vs. S.Kanakarajan & another reported in (2007) 5 SCC 669, Abdul Latif & Ors. Vs. Nagar Vikas Pranyas, Udaipur reported in AIR 2006 (Raj.) 215, Ravindra Tyagi Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. reported in AIR 2006 (Raj.) 220, Kashmir Singh Vs. Harnam Singh & Anr. reported in 2008 (4) RLW 3352 (SC), Dubaria Vs. Har Prasad & Anr. reported in 2010 CDR 290 (SC), Corporation of the City of Bangalore Vs. M.Papaiah & another reported in AIR 1989 (SC) 1809 and Chief Conservator of Forests, Govt. of A.P. Vs. Collector and ors. reported in AIR 2003 (SC) 1805.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rose vs G.Kannan on 3 June, 2019

13.In support of his contentions, the respondents' counsel placed reliance upon the decisions reported in 1968 AIR (SC) 1413 (Gopal Krishnaji Ketkar Vs. Mohamed Haji Latif and others), 2009 (5) CTC 563 (Dubaria Vs. Har Prasad and another), 2010-3-L.W.908 (Chinnammal and another Vs. Valliammal and two others) and 1998(1) CTC 477 (Muthu Goundar Vs. Poosari @ Palaniappan and 4 others). The principles of law outlined in the abovesaid decisions are taken into consideration and followed as applicable to the case at hand.
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - T Ravindran - Full Document

Smt. Chandra Prabha vs Haryana State Through Its District ... on 6 April, 2010

Learned counsel for the appellant also relied upon Dubaria versus Har Prasad and another, 2009(9) SCC 346, wherein it was held that evidence can be examined by High Court in regular second appeal. In the instant case, however, even after examining the evidence led in the suit, the appellant is found to be not entitled to any relief for the reasons recorded hereinabove.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - L N Mittal - Full Document
1   2 Next