Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.77 seconds)

Satish Chand vs General Manager N C Rly on 11 October, 2018

9. Reference may be made to WPCT No. 210 of 2008 titled Alok Dev Roy v/s Union of India decided vide order dated 19.08.2009 wherein the facts were similar to the facts of the present case and interpreting Railway Board Circular No. E(D&A) 93 RG6-83 dated December 1, 1993 (RBE No. 171/1993), Hon'ble High Court Calcutta while quashing the 2nd charge sheet held that:
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kunal Kamra vs Union Of India on 31 January, 2024

In paragraph 55, he held that it was settled law that where there were no reasonable standards prescribed to define guilt in a section that creates an offence, and absent clear guidance, such a section would be struck down as arbitrary and unreasonable: Shreya Singhal, paragraph 63 (citing Reno v American Civil Liberties Union43); less restrictive alternatives equally effective in achieving a legitimate purpose are to be preferred (Shreya Singhal, paragraph 65); the doctrine of 'vagueness' is not alien to our jurisprudence: Shreya Singhal, paragraph 68, citing KA Abbas v Union of India;44 Harakchand Ratanchand Banthia v Union of India;45 State of MP v Baldeo Prasad;46 in paragraph 70, citing AK Roy v Union of India. 47 43 521 US 844 : 138 L.Ed. 2d 874 (1997).
Bombay High Court Cites 79 - Cited by 0 - G S Patel - Full Document
1