Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.39 seconds)
Documents citing Anil Tanti Son Of Sri Pali Tanti Village ... vs The State Of Jharkhand on 14 May, 2018

Sher Mohammad vs State Of Jharkhand on 26 August, 2025

21. Learned counsel for the appellant in support of his case as referred the judgments rendered by Hon‟ble Apex Court in the case of Ram Kumar Gijroya Vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board & Anr. [(2016) 4 SCC 754]; Anil Tanti Vs. State of Jharkhand & Or. [2018(2) JBCJ 42 (HC); Tausif Raza Vs. The Union of India & Ors [WPC No. 4572 of 2012]; Ms. Pushpa Vs. Government of NCT of Delhi [ 2009 SCC OnLIne Del 281; Tej Pal Singh & Ors. Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi [120 (2005) DLT 117 and Latika Vs. Staff Selection Commission & Ors. 2017 Law Suit (Del) 4528. Submission behalf of respondents-JPSC:
Jharkhand High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - S N Prasad - Full Document

Sher Mohammad vs State Of Jharkhand on 26 August, 2025

21. Learned counsel for the appellant in support of his case as referred the judgments rendered by Hon‟ble Apex Court in the case of Ram Kumar Gijroya Vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board & Anr. [(2016) 4 SCC 754]; Anil Tanti Vs. State of Jharkhand & Or. [2018(2) JBCJ 42 (HC); Tausif Raza Vs. The Union of India & Ors [WPC No. 4572 of 2012]; Ms. Pushpa Vs. Government of NCT of Delhi [ 2009 SCC OnLIne Del 281; Tej Pal Singh & Ors. Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi [120 (2005) DLT 117 and Latika Vs. Staff Selection Commission & Ors. 2017 Law Suit (Del) 4528. Submission behalf of respondents-JPSC:
Jharkhand High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - S N Prasad - Full Document

Dharmendra Paswan vs The State Of Jharkhand on 2 June, 2020

In Anil Tanti Case the rejection of candidature was of late submission of caste certificate. In this case as petitioner in Annexure-5 of the writ petition has admitted that caste certificate was issued by the Circle Officer, in terms of Clause-8(i) and 8(iii) of the Advertisement, the condition of the advertisement has not been complied by the petitioner. Thus the 8 judgment rerlied on by the learned counsel for the petitioner is distinguishable in the facts and circumstances of the present case and accordingly, on the basis of that judgment, no relief can be extended to the petitioner.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S K Dwivedi - Full Document
1