Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.53 seconds)

) Smt. Saroj Wd/O Late Sh. Sanjeev Kumar vs ) Sh. Rama Nand Pandey (Driver) on 22 May, 2012

As already discussed above, the age of the deceased was approximately 33 years at the time of his death as per School Transfer Certificate of the deceased, which is Ex.PW1/4. Hence, in view of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court given in Pushpa & Others Vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Another reported in 2011 ACJ 2140, multiplier of 16 has to be applied upon the income of the deceased.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Kulwant Kaur Widow/O Late Sh. Gopal ... vs Sh. Giribar Singh S/O Sh. Ladu Singh ... on 29 May, 2012

As already discussed above, the age of the deceased was approximately 67 years at the time of his death as per driving licence of the deceased. Hence, in view of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court given in Pushpa & Others Vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Another reported in 2011 ACJ 2140, multiplier of 5 has to be applied upon the income of the deceased.
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

)Sh. Bablu Sahani S/O Sh. Mental Sahani vs ) Sh. Nand Kishore S/O Vindhiyachal ... on 31 May, 2012

As already discussed above, as per Election I-Card the age of the deceased was approximately 35 years at the time of her death. Hence, in view of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court given in Pushpa & Others Vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Another reported in 2011 ACJ 2140, multiplier of 16 has to be applied upon the income of the deceased.
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Sant Baksh S/O Sh. Raja Ram Singh vs ) Sh. Raghubir Singh S/O Sh. Jugti Ram on 31 May, 2012

As already discussed above, as per postmortem report the age of the deceased was approximately 20 years at the time of her death. Hence, in view of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court given in Pushpa & Others Vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Another reported in 2011 ACJ 2140, multiplier of 18 has to 7 be applied upon the income of the deceased. Accordingly, in this case, loss of dependency is assessed at Rs.10,46,520/- (4845/- x 12 x 18). Hence, the petitioners are only entitled to Rs.10,46,520/- on account of loss of dependency. It is pertinent to mention here that since deceased had died issueless, hence I am of the view that 50% deduction on account of personal expenses be made from the total amount of loss of dependency, which comes to Rs.5,23,260/- (Rs.10,46,520/- less 50%).
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

) Smt. Nirmala Devi Wd/O Late Sh. Asho ... vs ) Sh. Nand Kishore S/O Vindhiyachal on 31 May, 2012

As already discussed above, the age of the deceased was approximately 50 years at the time of his death as per post mortem report of the deceased. Hence, in view of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court given in Pushpa & Others Vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Another reported in 2011 ACJ 2140, multiplier of 11 has to be applied upon the income of the deceased.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

) Sh. Surender Singh S/O Sh. Ronak Singh vs ) Sh. Ram Babu @ Bhola S/O Sh. Bachhan ... on 4 July, 2012

As already discussed above, the age of the deceased was approximately 21 years and he was unmarried at the time of his death. Hence, in view of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court given in Pushpa & Others Vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Another reported in 2011 ACJ 2140, multiplier of 18 has to be applied upon the income of the deceased.
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

) Smt.Gowramma vs ) M/S.Reliance General Insurance on 27 February, 2015

16. With regard to award of loss of future prospectus, the counsel for the respondent No.1, during the counsel of arguments contended, that the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka, in an unreported judgment in MFA No.4332/2013 (MV) (New India Assurance Co., Ltd., Vs. Sri K.Pushparaj), SCCH 1 9 MVC No.617/14 dated 19.09.2014, has held that in view of the order dated 2.7.2014 in Pushpa Vs. National Insurance Co., Ltd.,, passed by the Supreme Court, awarding loss of future prospectus does not arise and hence, prayed the Court to reject the prayer of the petitioners regarding awarding of future prospectus.
Bangalore District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Rahul S/O Sh. Hukum Singh vs ) Sh. Rajender Kumar S/O Sh. Ramesh Kumar on 29 May, 2012

As already discussed above, the age of the deceased was approximately 33 years at the time of his death as per School Transfer Certificate of the deceased, which is Ex.PW1/4. Hence, in view of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court given in Pushpa & Others Vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Another reported in 2011 ACJ 2140, multiplier of 16 has to be applied upon the income of the deceased.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

) Smt. Pridhi Singh Wd/O Late Sh. Rishi ... vs ) Sh. Sheikh Abdul Gaffar S/O Sh. Sheikh ... on 12 April, 2012

As already discussed above, the age of the deceased was approximately 38 years at the time of his death as per CBSE certificate of the deceased Rishi Pal, which is Ex.PW4/12. Hence in view of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court given in Pushpa & Others Vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Another reported in 2011 ACJ 2140, multiplier of 16 has to be applied upon the income of the deceased.
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

)Sh. Bablu Sahni S/O Sh. Mental Sahni vs ) Sh. Nand Kishore S/O Vidhachal ... on 31 May, 2012

As already discussed above, as per document Ex.PW1/3 the age of the deceased was approximately 07 years at the time of his death. Hence, in view of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court given in Pushpa & Others Vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Another reported in 2011 ACJ 2140, multiplier of 16 has to be applied upon the income of the deceased, as per age of father of deceased since mother of the deceased has already expired.
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next