Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.37 seconds)

Jagrati Trade Services Private Limited vs Deepak Bhargava & Ors on 31 January, 2023

a. The power of the arbitrator to grant interim reliefs under section 17 of the Act is akin to the court's powers under section 9. The 246th Law Commission Report recommended the enhancement of arbitrator's powers to give teeth to their orders by elevating them to the status of a statutorily enforceable order of a court. The Parliament responded accordingly and made section 17 pari passu to that of section 9. Succeeding precedents such as that of Flywheel Logistics (supra) and my own observation in Gainwell (supra) reiterate the identical nature of sections 9 and 17 and the acceptance of the principle that applications under both these provisions would be governed under the same test of interim measures.
Calcutta High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 1 - S B Saraf - Full Document

Terratec Limited Through Its ... vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 20 February, 2026

Learned counsel for respondent No. 2 referring to the order of High Court of Madras in case of Flywheel Logistics Solutions Pvt Ltd. Vs. Hinduja Leyland Finance Ltd reported in (2020) 7 MLJ 475 and the affirmation order passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 2320/2021 by the Supreme Court of India, contends that the order regarding inspection of subject matter machinery is an interim award passed under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, therefore, it should be executed as a decree of civil Court. This Court in exercise of writ jurisdiction cannot pass any direction for execution of the interim award. The Interlocutory Application is meritless.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S S Kalgaonkar - Full Document
1