Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.30 seconds)
Documents citing Jatinder Singh Bhatia Son Of Shri Sat Pal vs Union Of India Through Secretary ... on 28 January, 2013

Sadhana Bhardwaj vs Technical Education Chandigarh on 18 November, 2025

25. In view of the above discussion, the Original Application is allowed. The respondents are directed to allow the applicant to continue in service as Librarian, Chandigarh College of Engineering & Technology (Diploma Wing), Sector-26, Chandigarh, up to the age of 62 years, in accordance with the applicable AICTE/UGC Regulations as interpreted and applied in judicial precedents including Dr. Joginder Pal Singh v. UOI, Renu Oberoi v. U.T. Chandigarh, Chief Secretary, NCT Delhi v. K.R. Mann, Dr. S. Kothandaraman, Dr. Bharat Sai Kumar, and the Constitution Bench judgment in State of Tamil Nadu v. Adhiyaman Educational & Research Institute. Her continuation in service shall be treated as valid without break, and she shall be entitled to all consequential benefits, including pay, allowances, seniority and pensionary benefits arising from such continuation. Any action treating the applicant as superannuated at the age of 60 years shall stand NEERU DOUGALL 2025.11.25 11:11:19+05'30' 18 (OA No. 194/2025) modified in terms of this order. The respondents shall also ensure that the process of upgradation and amendment of Recruitment Rules is completed expeditiously and the applicant's case is forwarded to UPSC wherever required, without insisting on any fresh selection unless mandated by the final approved norms.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Unknown vs Postgraduate Institute Of Medical ... on 16 December, 2016

Therefore, the reference made by Governing Body to Union Health Ministry, respondent No. 4, which has no power and authority to deal with such administrative matters under the provisions of PGI Act, was illegal and arbitrary. The respondent Institute and respondent No. 4 have filed separate affidavits in this regard in OA No. 1541 of 2013 admitting these facts. Copies of affidavits dated 24.12.2014/15.1.2015 filed by respondent No. 1 and dated 18.2.2015 by respondent no. 4 are being attached as Annexure A-6. Judgment dated 13.11.2014 in OA No. O.A.No.893/CH/2013 titled Jatinder Singh Vs. UOI and Others has been cited to buttress the contentions of the applicant that the Director, PGIMER was the cadre controlling authority of Group B, C and D employees and therefore, references made to the Union Ministry, respondent No. 4 were unwarranted.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1