Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.25 seconds)
Documents citing P.Rajakumari vs The Additional Director General Of on 24 September, 2014

Bhanumathi ? vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 16 December, 2016

The counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention to this Court in a judgement rendered in P. Rajakumari Vs the Additional Director General of Police and another (CDJ 2014 MHC 3992) wherein the petitioner?s mother was subjected to custodial torture the same was entertained this Court granted interim relief of Rs. 2,00,000/- Compensation and further this Court ordered C.B.I. Investigation. Hence the petitioner who is the mother victim is entitled to seek compensation and other relief for the mental and physical injuries caused by police officials to her son. Hence I am of the view that the Petitioner is entitled to file writ petition for her son. Accordingly first question is answered.
Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - M V Muralidaran - Full Document

U.Vasuki vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 6 January, 2015

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, drawn our attention to the notification dated 30.11.2013 issued by the Tamil Nadu Government in terms of thereof, the amount of compensation has been specified at Rs.3 lakhs. Placing reliance upon the decisions rendered by the Supreme Court in MOHD. HAROON AND OTHERS V. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER (W.P.(Criminal) No.155 of 2013) and In Re: Indian Woman says gang-raped on orders of Village Court published in Business and Financial News dated 23.01.2014 (Suo motu writ petition (Criminal) No.24 of 2014) and also the decision of this Court in P.RAJAKUMARI V. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (PRISONS) AND OTHERS (W.P.No.23320 of 2014 Dated 24.09.2014), the learned counsel has submitted that appropriate compensation will have to be paid. By taking into consideration of the facts of the case, a submission has been made that the rehabilitation of the victim is constitutional right. As the offence alleged is a congnizable, the learned counsel contended that the Station Officer had no choice except to register the complaint given at the earliest point of time instead of keeping it pending. A further submission has been made stating that the respondents have not taken into consideration of the amended provisions with respect to the definition of rape.
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - M M Sundresh - Full Document

Thavakannan vs The Secretary To Government on 23 March, 2020

11. A careful reading of the judgments relied on by the learned counsel for the petitioner in (i) P.Rajakumari Vs. The Additional Director General of Police, is concerned, it relates to the custodial violence and in that case, compensation was awarded; per contra, the present case is with regard to taking of disciplinary action. The judgment in A.G.Subramaniam Vs.State of Tamilnadu, is concerned, the Single judge of this Court has ordered for compensation and also to take disciplinary proceedings as against the erring officials.
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1