The State Of Maharashtra vs A) Sahadu Aba Shete on 25 September, 2008
The judgment in LAR No.194 of 1992 was pronounced on
29th April, 1999 while all the three judgments referred above
were pronounced on 14th July, 1999, 31st December, 1999
and 30th October, 2000. Thus, the applicants despite
exercise of due diligence could not have produced these
documents. Thus, as far as other documents are concerned,
the Map has already been produced on record in the
connected appeals. Thus, no prejudice would be caused to
any party as the map in question is a copy of the Map
Exhibit-148 in LAR No.194 of 1992 For these reasons, we
partially allow the applications filed for additional evidence
and permit the Sale Deed dated 17th May, 1989 as well as
the judgments of the Reference Court dated 14th July, 1999,
31st December, 1999 and 30th October, 2000 and the Map
Exhibit-148 to be read in evidence as they are already
exhibited in the connected appeals and/or the same are a
part of judicial record by way of impugned judgment in the
::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 13:54:11 :::
This Order is modified/corrected by Speaking to Minutes Order
37
connected appeals. However, as far as placing on record
the Circular dated 18th December, 1975 and other
documents in the connected applications by the applicants
are concerned, we find no justification to allow the said
applications, and to that extent the same are dismissed.