Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 404 (2.71 seconds)
Documents citing Justice K.S.Puttaswamy(Retd) vs Union Of India on 26 September, 2018

Rajesh Manibhai Patel vs Gujarat Medical Education Research ... on 20 September, 2021

25 K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, (2019) 10 SCC 1 [AADHAAR 5JB]. and the have-nots. He further held that the humanistic concept of human dignity which is to be accorded to that particular segment of the society has to be kept in mind. Their human dignity is based on the socio-economic rights that are read into the fundamental rights. The importance of the communitarian approach along with the individualistic approach to human dignity was addressed by Dr. A.K. Sikri, J. in the above judgment. The learned Judge emphasised on the role of the State and Page 33 of 41 Downloaded on : Sun Jan 16 16:25:31 IST 2022 C/SCA/12640/2021 ORDER DATED: 20/09/2021 community in establishing collective goals and restrictions on individual freedoms and rights on behalf of a certain idea of the good life.
Gujarat High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - B D Karia - Full Document

Rajesh Manibhai Patel vs Gujarat Medical Education Research ... on 20 September, 2021

25 K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, (2019) 10 SCC 1 [AADHAAR 5JB]. and the have-nots. He further held that the humanistic concept of human dignity which is to be accorded to that particular segment of the society has to be kept in mind. Their human dignity is based on the socio-economic rights that are read into the fundamental rights. The importance of the communitarian approach along with the individualistic approach to human dignity was addressed by Dr. A.K. Sikri, J. in the above judgment. The learned Judge emphasised on the role of the State and Page 33 of 41 Downloaded on : Sat Oct 09 04:33:44 IST 2021 C/SCA/12640/2021 ORDER DATED: 20/09/2021 community in establishing collective goals and restrictions on individual freedoms and rights on behalf of a certain idea of the good life.
Gujarat High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - B D Karia - Full Document

Introduction Of Election Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2021. on 20 December, 2021

No person shall be deprived of his life and personal liberty except in accordance with the procedure established by law. This is what Article 21 of the Constitution says. On the basis of Article 21, in Justice Puttaswamy versus Union of India case, the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has held that right to privacy is a Fundamental Right under Article 21 of the Constitution. … (Interruptions)
Lok Sabha Debates Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Association Of Medical Super ... vs Union Of India on 19 August, 2019

25 K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, (2019) 10 SCC 1 [AADHAAR 5JB]. 33 and the have-nots. He further held that the humanistic concept of human dignity which is to be accorded to that particular segment of the society has to be kept in mind. Their human dignity is based on the socio-economic rights that are read into the fundamental rights. The importance of the communitarian approach along with the individualistic approach to human dignity was addressed by Dr. A.K. Sikri, J. in the above judgment. The learned Judge emphasised on the role of the State and community in establishing collective goals and restrictions on individual freedoms and rights on behalf of a certain idea of the good life.
Supreme Court of India Cites 38 - Cited by 69 - L N Rao - Full Document

Sukanya Shantha vs Union Of India on 3 October, 2024

29 (1973) 4 SCC 225 30 (1976) 2 SCC 310 31 (2011) 6 SCALE 86 13 PART IV 20 This Court held in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India 32 that the “vision of the founding fathers was enriched by the histories of suffering of those who suffered oppression and a violation of dignity both here and elsewhere”. One of us (Justice DY Chandrachud) authored the plurality opinion, holding that the interpretation of the Constitution must keep evolving to facilitate justice for the citizens.
Supreme Court of India Cites 174 - Cited by 0 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document

Jayalakshmi vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 17 February, 2021

17.1 There is another angle to it. Administrative fairness and the respect for rule of law necessarily includes respect for judicial orders. Article 261 of the Constitution mandates that the Executive shall give full faith and credit to all judicial acts. This provision indeed is a positive prescription written in a tone of moral philosophy. It may not have exhorted a sense of duty as in Article 51A of the Constitution, nor have installed any fear of penalty for its violation, but being a moral-binder it deserves spontaneous respect. 17.2 In K.S. Puttaswamy Vs Union of India, [(2019) 1 SCC 1], the Hon’ble Supreme court has elevated the content of this provision as an aspect of Constitutional morality. The Court observes:
Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - N Seshasayee - Full Document

Trigyansh Jain vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors on 17 May, 2022

"25. As held in the Air India case (cited supra), the Supreme Court had suggested an amendment to the rule. In Javed's case, the Supreme Court was only dealing with the disqualifying provisions found in the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act from contesting election. But in both judgments, the constitutional guarantee as well as non obstante clause found in the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 were not considered. So long as the non obstante clause is found under Section 27, the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KAMLESH KUMAR W.P. (C) 3629/2022 Page 7 of 11 Signing Date:24.05.2022 15:08:27 constitutional obligation found under Article 42 as well as ILO norms set out above are to be the guiding factor, it is not open to the Government to deny maternity protection including paid leave as provided. By intruding an explanation to FR 101 by an executive instruction cannot be treated as substantial rule to deny the constitutional right of a woman Government servant as had happened in the present case.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - N Waziri - Full Document

Rajiv Mohan Mishra vs City And Industrial Development ... on 2 November, 2018

(emphasis added) 44 Another decision of the Constitution Bench of the Apex Court which is very material on the aspect ::: Uploaded on - 03/11/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2018 01:30:32 ::: 54 is in the case of K.S.Puttaswamy Vs. Union of India (supra). The Apex Court was dealing with the right of privacy which is guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution. The majority view which is reflected from the erudite exposition by Dr D.Y. Chandrachud, J. (On behalf of Khehar, C.J., Agrawal, J., himself and Nazeer, J.) reads thus:
Bombay High Court Cites 137 - Cited by 8 - A Oka - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next