Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.24 seconds)

Keshav Chander Thakur & Anr vs Krishan Chander & Ors on 24 May, 2013

The plaintiffs however claim the same to be no longer good law owing to SLP(C) No.22578/1994 having been preferred against the judgment in Chander Kishore Gulati (supra) and having been allowed vide order dated 27th April, 1995. However, a perusal thereof shows that the SLP was allowed with the consent of the parties and without adjudicating the said issue. It cannot be thus said that the said judgments have been set aside or CS(OS) No.1397/2011 Page 8 of 13 are no longer good law. I see no reason to not follow the said view. The objection thus of the plaintiffs to the decree of the Jammu Court being bad for this reason disappears.
Delhi High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - R S Endlaw - Full Document
1