Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (1.05 seconds)

State Of Madras Represented By Spl. ... vs Muthurethinam And Ors. on 17 November, 1969

14. expressed the view that the time for preferring an appeal should be calculated on the endorsements on the copies of judgment produced in each of the appeals, even if they were filed in a batch and in one of them such copies were produced and in the rest their production was dispensed with. At the same time it was felt in that case that delay, in such cases might, however, be excused in the circumstances. The correctness of this view has been examined by us and we are of opinion that, on a proper construction of Section 12(2) and (3) and of the principles evolved by some of the decided cases relevant to the question, the view in does require modification.
Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Sirajuddeen vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 19 December, 2019

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by applicant to quash the charge sheet dated 02.08.2019, cognizance order and N.B.W. issued by Special Judge/ Additional Sessions Judge-III, Auraiya and stay the entire proceeding of Special Case No.2100 of 2019, (State Vs. Sirajudeen), arising out of Case Crime No.101 of 2019, under Section 135 of Indian Electricity Act (Amendment) 2003, P.S. Sahayal, District-Auraiya.
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1