V.Arumugam Pillai vs R.Nehruji By His Power Agent on 1 October, 2009
6. The main contention of the learned counsel for the Petitioner is
that the order passed by the court below is in violation of mandatory provisions
of Order 39 Rule 3 of CPC as it is without any reason and hence it is not
sustainable in law. The learned counsel cited a few decisions of this court
rendered in the cases of The Andhra Social & Cultural Association by B.Veeriah
General Secretary [2000-11-CTC-235], M/s.RR/Techno Mechanicals (P) Limited and
another Vs. Democratic Labour Union [1996-11-CTC-684] and
Rt.Rev.Dr.V.Devasaayam, Bishop in Madras CSI and another Vs. D.Sahayadoss and 2
others [2002-1-CTC-458] in support of his contention.