Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 38 (0.46 seconds)
Documents citing Workmen Rastriya Colliery Mazdoor ... vs Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. & Anr on 3 October, 2016

Smt. Sumfali Devi vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Another on 2 April, 2019

9. The question with regard to competence of the Labour Court to award compensation in such like cases is no more res integra. The Apex Court in Workmen Rastriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., (2016) 9 SCC 431 and Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh v. Employers, (2017) 1 SCC 264, has dealt with the issue at hand and has proceeded to award compensation to the tune of `4.00 Lakh to each of the workmen in the latter case, as such, argument advanced by Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned Additional Advocate ::: Downloaded on - 04/04/2019 21:58:31 :::HCHP -7- General that no compensation could have been awarded on account of delay in raising the dispute, deserves outright rejection. However, taking note of the fact that the workman .
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 40 - Full Document

Shri Raj Kumar vs The Executive Engineer on 9 April, 2019

11. The question with regard to competence of the Labour Court to award compensation in such like cases is no more res integra. The Apex Court in Workmen Rastriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., (2016) 9 SCC 431 and Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh v. Employers, (2017) 1 SCC 264, has dealt with the issue at hand and has proceeded to award compensation to the tune of `4.00 Lakh to each of the workmen in the latter case, as such, argument advanced by Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General that no compensation could have been awarded on account of delay in raising the dispute, deserves outright rejection.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Lekh Raj vs The Executive Engineer on 9 April, 2019

11. The question with regard to competence of the Labour Court to award compensation in such like cases is no more res integra. The Apex Court in Workmen Rastriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., (2016) 9 SCC 431 and Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh v. Employers, (2017) 1 SCC 264, has dealt with the issue at hand and has proceeded to award compensation to the tune of `4.00 Lakh to each of the workmen in the latter case, as such, argument advanced by Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General that no compensation could have been awarded on account of delay in raising the dispute, deserves outright rejection.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Parkash Chand vs The Executive Engineer on 9 April, 2019

11. The question with regard to competence of the Labour Court to award compensation in such like cases is no more res integra. The Apex Court in Workmen Rastriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., (2016) 9 SCC 431 and Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh v. Employers, (2017) 1 SCC 264, has dealt with the issue at hand and has proceeded to award compensation to the tune of `4.00 Lakh to each of the workmen in the latter case, as such, argument advanced by Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General that no compensation could have been awarded on account of delay in raising the dispute, deserves outright rejection.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Khem Raj vs The Executive Engineer on 9 April, 2019

11. The question with regard to competence of the Labour Court to award compensation in such like cases is no more res integra. The Apex Court in Workmen Rastriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., (2016) 9 SCC 431 and Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh v. Employers, (2017) 1 SCC 264, has dealt with the issue at hand and has proceeded to award compensation to the tune of `4.00 Lakh to each of the workmen in the latter case, as such, argument advanced by Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General that no compensation could have been awarded on account of delay in raising the dispute, deserves outright rejection.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Satya Devi vs The Engineer-In-Chief on 9 April, 2019

11. The question with regard to competence of the Labour Court to award compensation in such like cases is no more res integra. The Apex Court in Workmen Rastriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., (2016) 9 SCC 431 and Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh v. Employers, (2017) 1 SCC 264, has dealt with the issue at hand and has proceeded to award compensation to the tune of `4.00 Lakh to each of the workmen in the latter case, as such, argument advanced by Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General that no compensation could have been awarded on account of delay in raising the dispute, deserves outright rejection.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Panjku Ram vs The Engineer-In-Chief on 9 April, 2019

11. The question with regard to competence of the Labour Court to award compensation in such like cases is no more res integra. The Apex Court in Workmen Rastriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., (2016) 9 SCC 431 and Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh v. Employers, (2017) 1 SCC 264, has dealt with the issue at hand and has proceeded to award compensation to the tune of `4.00 Lakh to each of the workmen in the latter case, as such, argument advanced by Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General that no compensation could have been awarded on account of delay in raising the dispute, deserves outright rejection.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Kishan Dei vs The Executive Engineer on 9 April, 2019

11. The question with regard to competence of the Labour Court to award compensation in such like cases is no more res integra. The Apex Court in Workmen Rastriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., (2016) 9 SCC 431 and Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh v. Employers, (2017) 1 SCC 264, has dealt with the issue at hand and has proceeded to award compensation to the tune of `4.00 Lakh to each of the workmen in the latter case, as such, argument advanced by Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General that no compensation could have been awarded on account of delay in raising the dispute, deserves outright rejection.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Bimla Devi vs The Engineer-In-Chief on 10 April, 2019

11. The question with regard to competence of the Labour Court to award compensation in such like cases is no more res integra. The Apex Court in Workmen Rastriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., (2016) 9 SCC 431 and Rashtriya Colliery Mazdoor Sangh v. Employers, (2017) 1 SCC 264, has dealt with the issue at hand and has proceeded to award compensation to the tune of `4.00 Lakh to each of the workmen in the latter case, as such, argument advanced by Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General that no compensation could have been awarded on account of delay in raising the dispute, deserves outright rejection.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next