Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.46 seconds)
Documents citing M/S. Madhav Structural Engineering ... vs The Vice Chairman And Managing ... on 27 July, 2016

Accord Advertising Pvt. Ltd vs Airports Director on 31 July, 2019

We have noticed a contrary view of the Bombay High Court in Madhav Structural Engineering (supra) that since the right of review is not provided in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Court dealing with arbitration matters under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot review its own orders but for the reasons we have indicated above we are unable to accept the said view.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 32 - Cited by 2 - S Sen - Full Document

Hardy Exploration And Production ... vs Hindustan Oil Exploration Company ... on 10 August, 2021

5.3 Mr.Thakore would also rely on the decision in case of Madhav Structural Engineering v. Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation reported in (2013) 2 MahLJ 372. Inviting the attention of the Court to para 15 of the decision he would submit that the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is a contained Code and does not provide for any remedial review.
Gujarat High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 0 - B Vaishnav - Full Document

General Manager, Northern Railway And ... vs M/S J And K Projects Construction ... on 5 February, 2021

Learned counsel for the petitioner has sought to seek support from M/s. I.T.I. Ltd. Vs. M/s Siemens Public Communications Network Ltd. 2003(1) R.C.R. (Civil) 745, Civil Appeal No. 9106 of 2019, M/S Deep Industries Limited Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited and another, M/s Madhav Structural Engineering Ltd. and another Vs. The Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Limited, Review Petition (ST) No. 16618 of 2010, Union of India Vs. Pradeep Vinod Construction Company, Civil Appeal No. 6400 of 2016 and Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, learned counsel for the respondent has placed reliance on Bharat Broadband Network Limited Vs. United Telecoms Limited, Civil Appeal No. 3972 of 2019, Fuerst Day Lawson Vs. Jindal Exports Ltd. 2011(3) ArbiLR 82, HRD Corporation (Marcus Oil and Chemical Division) Vs. Gail (India) Limited (formerly Gas Authority of India Ltd.) Civil Appeal No. 11126 of 2017, Omaxe Infrasturcture and Construction Ltd. Vs. Union of 9 of 11 ::: Downloaded on - 22-08-2021 17:45:23 ::: CR 2274 of 2020 (O&M) 10 India and another, O.M.P. (T) (COMM.)
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - F D Singh - Full Document

M/S Prestige Feedmills Ltd. Thr. Shri ... vs K.N. Resources on 23 August, 2022

5. Shri Amit Agrawal, learned senior counsel appearing for the review petitioner, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer and it is submitted that the review petition is very much maintainable and so far as the decision rendered by the Bombay High Court in the case of Madhav Structural Engineering Ltd. (supra) is concerned, the same has already been distinguished by a Division Bench of Calcutta High Court in the case of Accord Advertising Private Limited Vs. Airports Director, The Airports Authority of India in CAN 7354 of 2019 in R.V.W.171 of 2019.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 1 - S Abhyankar - Full Document

M/S Coronet Engineers Private Limited vs M/S Nish Techno Projects Private ... on 17 November, 2025

In the decision of the Bombay High Court in Madhav Structural Engineer (supra), while addressing the termination of an arbitrator's mandate, the Court held that a conjoint reading of Section 12(3)(a) and Section 13(2) of the A&C Act indicates Page 18 of 20 Uploaded by SHRIJIT PILLAI(HC01400) on Mon Nov 24 2025 Downloaded on : Mon Nov 24 20:41:58 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/12956/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 17/11/2025 undefined that an arbitrator may be challenged only if circumstances give rise to justifiable doubts as to his independence or impartiality. The challenge must be made within the prescribed period. Section 13(3) provides that the arbitral tribunal shall decide on the challenge unless the arbitrator withdraws. If the challenge is not successful, the arbitral tribunal is mandated to continue the arbitral proceedings and make an arbitral award. Once the arbitral award is made under Section 13(4), the challenging party may make an application for setting aside such an arbitral award in accordance with Section 34 of the A&C Act.
Gujarat High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1