Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (0.88 seconds)
Documents citing Satyavir Singh vs State Of U.P on 11 February, 2010

Bhagwandas @ Pappu S/O Sureshchandra ... vs State Of Gujarat on 27 July, 2021

19. This Court in Satyavir Singh v. State of U.P., held: (SCC p. 183. para 21) "21.... Perverse' was stated to be behaviour which most of the people would take as wrong, unacceptable, unreasonable and a 'perverse' verdict may probably be defined as one that is not only against the weight of the evidence but is altogether against the evidence. Besides, a finding being 'perverse', it could also suffer from the infirmity of distorted conclusions and glaring mistakes."
Gujarat High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - A J Shastri - Full Document

Bhagwandas @ Pappu S/O Sureshchandra ... vs State Of Gujarat on 27 July, 2021

19. This Court in Satyavir Singh v. State of U.P., held: (SCC p. 183. para 21) "21.... Perverse' was stated to be behaviour which most of the people would take as wrong, unacceptable, unreasonable and a 'perverse' verdict may probably be defined as one that is not only against the weight of the evidence but is altogether against the evidence. Besides, a finding being 'perverse', it could also suffer from the infirmity of distorted conclusions and glaring mistakes."
Gujarat High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - A J Shastri - Full Document

Purnimaben P. Chokshi vs Uco Bank on 29 April, 2022

19. This Court in Satyavir Singh v. State of U.P. held :(SCC p. 183, para 21) "21..... 'Perverse' was stated to be behaviour which most of the people would take as wrong, unacceptable, unreasonable and a 'perverse' verdict may probably defined as one that is not only against the weight of the evidence but is altogether against the evidence. Besides, a finding being 'perverse', it could also suffer from the infirmity of distorted conclusions and glaring mistakes."
Gujarat High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - A J Shastri - Full Document

State Of Punjab vs Raj Kumar Monga on 25 April, 2023

- 7- deed was not proved as per the provision of the Indian Evidence Act. There is nothing that has been brought out to dispel the reasoning of the lower appellate Court that the case involves a breach of contract and mens rea was lacking to commit the offence, a major part of the contract having been concluded. There is no substantial question of law raised on behalf of the appellant. Where the judgment of acquittal is recorded, two important aspects emerge therefrom, before the appellate Court. Firstly, there is presumption of innocence of the accused person in our criminal jurisprudence and secondly, the concerned court has recorded the finding in favour of the accused and disbelieved the prosecution and has founded as a matter of fact that the prosecution has failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, thus giving benefit to the accused. Both these presumptions-jurisprudential and in regard to the factual matrix- must be kept in mind and unless the conclusions reached by the Court were palpably erroneous or contrary to law or it is likely to result in injustice. The High Court may be reluctant in interfering with the judgment of acquittal. [See Satyavir Singh vs. State of U.P., (2010) 3 SCC 174]
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State Of Punjab vs Sudarshan Singh on 25 April, 2023

- 7- deed was not proved as per the provision of the Indian Evidence Act. There is nothing that has been brought out to dispel the reasoning of the lower appellate Court that the case involves a breach of contract and mens rea was lacking to commit the offence, a major part of the contract having been concluded. There is no substantial question of law raised on behalf of the appellant. Where the judgment of acquittal is recorded, two important aspects emerge therefrom, before the appellate Court. Firstly, there is presumption of innocence of the accused person in our criminal jurisprudence and secondly, the concerned court has recorded the finding in favour of the accused and disbelieved the prosecution and has founded as a matter of fact that the prosecution has failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, thus giving benefit to the accused. Both these presumptions-jurisprudential and in regard to the factual matrix- must be kept in mind and unless the conclusions reached by the Court were palpably erroneous or contrary to law or it is likely to result in injustice. The High Court may be reluctant in interfering with the judgment of acquittal. [See Satyavir Singh vs. State of U.P., (2010) 3 SCC 174]
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Tara Chand vs Jagdish And Ors on 13 April, 2023

10. Firstly, there is presumption of innocence of the accused person in our criminal jurisprudence and secondly, the concerned court has recorded the finding in favour of the accused and disbelieved the prosecution and has founded as a matter of fact that the prosecution has failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, thus giving benefit to the accused. Both these presumptions- jurisprudential and in regard to the factual matrix- must be kept in mind and unless the conclusions reached by the Court were palpably erroneous or contrary to law or it is likely to result in injustice.[See Satyavir Singh vs. State of U.P., (2010) 3 SCC 174]
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ranbir And Anr vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 15 May, 2023

In Satyavir Singh vs. State of U.P., (2010) 3 SCC 174, Hon'ble The Supreme Court had observed and held that where a judgment of acquittal is recorded, two important aspects emerge therefrom, before the appellate Court. Firstly, there is presumption of innocence of the accused person in our criminal jurisprudence and secondly, the concerned court has recorded the finding in favour of the accused and disbelieved the prosecution and has founded as a matter of fact that the prosecution has failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, thus giving benefit to the accused. Both these presumptions-jurisprudential and in 8 of 9 ::: Downloaded on - 13-06-2023 01:19:59 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:075631 CRR-3696-2017 (O&M) - 9- regard to the factual matrix- must be kept in mind unless the conclusions reached by the Court were palpably erroneous or contrary to law.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next