Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 146 (1.17 seconds)
Documents citing Hindustan Times & Ors vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 1 November, 2002

Societe Pepper Grenoble S.A.R.L. vs Union Of India (Uoi) on 20 April, 2005

The question of unequal bargaining power is not required to be accepted in the present case. In all the contracts, parties are entering into an agreement and it is in view of the agreement entered into between the parties, Arbitrator is appointed. When a retired Judge is appointed as an Arbitrator, we fail to understand as to how the appellant is aggrieved with the arbitration on the ground that the contract is void. We have gone through the decision cited by the counsel for the appellant in case of Hindustan Times v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 2003 SCC 250 and Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Limted v. Brojo Nath, AIR 1986 SCC 1571.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S K Kaul - Full Document

Smt. Usha Rani Gupta And 4 Others vs State Of U P Through The Chief Secretary ... on 4 November, 2019

9. Subsequently, by way of an amendment, para-88A has been added stating that actual physical possession of disputed Nazul land has been taken by respondents on 20.11.2018 from occupants i.e. Women's Polytechnic, behind back, and without knowledge of petitioners. Consequently a prayer for restoration of possession has also been added by way of amendment in writ petition. On behalf of petitioners, reliance has placed on State of Maharashtra Vs. Vithalrao Ganpatrao Warhade 1998 (8) SCC 284; Binani Properties Private Ltd. Vs. M. Gulamali Abdul Hossain and Co. and Others AIR 1967 Cal 390; The State of U.P. Vs. Zahoor Ahmad and Another 1973 (2) SCC 547; Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Limited and Another Vs. Brojo Nath Ganguly and Another 1986 (3) SCC 156; Hindustan Times and Others Vs. State of U.P and another 2003 (1) SCC 591; Delhi Development Authority Vs. Durga Chand Kaushish 1973 (2) SCC 825; K.T. Plantation Private Limited and Another Vs. State of Karnataka 2011 (9) SCC 1; Tukaram Kana Joshi and Others vs. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and Others 2013 (1) SCC 353, Raja Rajinder Chand Vs. Mst.
Allahabad High Court Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next