Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.33 seconds)

Vineet Gupta vs Union Of India And Ors. & Anr on 10 February, 2026

21. The decision in the case of Viraj Chetan Shah was also considered by a coordinate bench of this Court in Sahil Chugh v. Union of India8, wherein, it was held that LOC issued at the behest of a public sector bank against borrowers/directors merely on account of loan default or declaration as wilful defaulters, in the absence of any criminal proceedings, are unsustainable in law. It was emphasized that the expression "detrimental to the economic interests of India" under the MHA guidelines is meant for exceptional cases involving grave, systemic or national economic impact, and not routine commercial defaults. Since in the facts of the case therein no FIR, charge-sheet, or cognizable offence was pending against the petitioner, and the disputes were purely civil and pending before the DRT, the Court quashed the LOC as arbitrary and disproportionate. The relevant extract of the aforesaid decision is extracted as under:-
Delhi High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - P K Kaurav - Full Document

Ritu Singal vs Bureau Of Immigration & Ors on 17 April, 2026

23. The decision in Viraj Chetan Shah was applied and followed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Sahil Chugh v. Union of India.8 The Court held that an LOC issued at the behest of a public sector bank against borrowers or directors merely on account of loan default or declaration as wilful defaulters, in the absence of any criminal proceedings, is unsustainable in law. The Court emphasised that the expression "detrimental to the economic interests of India"
Delhi High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - P K Kaurav - Full Document
1