Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 379 (1.67 seconds)
Documents citing Indian Ex-Services League And Ors. Etc vs Union Of India And Ors. Etc on 29 January, 1991

Balwant Singh And Anr. vs State Of Punjab And Ors. on 21 August, 2006

It was further held that: (SCC p.735, para 8) "In the case of Indian Ex-Services League v. Union of India this Court distinguished the decision in Nakara case and held that the ambit of that decision cannot be enlarged to cover all claim by retirees or a demand for an identical amount of pension to every retiree, irrespective of the date of retirement even though the emoluments for the purpose of computation of pension be different.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 5 - S S Saron - Full Document

E. Arumugam (Retd) vs The Government Of India on 17 June, 2015

13. It clearly appears from all these cases that Nakara case1 is not a case of universal application irrespective of the facts and circumstances of the case. When the Government decided that pension was to be calculated on the basis of average salary drawn over a period of last ten months, it was held in Nakara1 that this principle has to be applied even to those persons who had retired before the notified date. That, however, does not mean that the emoluments of the persons who were retiring after the notified date and those who have retired before the notified date holding the same status must be treated to be the same. This argument was specifically negatived by the Constitution Bench in the case of All India Services Pensioners? Assn.4 What the petitioner is claiming in this case is more or less the same relief as was denied to him in the above case.?
Madras High Court Cites 43 - Cited by 0 - V M Velumani - Full Document

Karnataka Power Corporation Limited vs Smt M S Rajeshwari on 22 April, 2026

In other words, what was held by this Court in the Indian Ex-Services League case that after introduction of the liberalisation scheme, from a specified date, even the retirees earlier to the same date would get the benefit of the liberalisation scheme but not in the same manner and to the same extent to which persons in service and retiring after the date would get."
Karnataka High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kamla Devi vs State Of Haryana And Others on 19 July, 2024

In this connection, the ratios in Krishena Kumar v. Union of India, 1990(4) SCC 207; Indian Ex-Services League v. Union of India, 1991(1) S.C.T. 468 : 1991(2) SCC 104; State Government Pensioners' Association v. State of A.P., 1986(3) SCC 501 and All India Reserve Bank Retired Officers' Association v. Union of India, 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 664 are apt. In all these cases, the prescription of a cut-off date for implementation of such benefits was held not to be arbitrary, irrational or violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - H S Sethi - Full Document

Azad Singh And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 19 July, 2024

In this connection, the ratios in Krishena Kumar v. Union of India, 1990(4) SCC 207; Indian Ex-Services League v. Union of India, 1991(1) S.C.T. 468 : 1991(2) SCC 104; State Government Pensioners' Association v. State of A.P., 1986(3) SCC 501 and All India Reserve Bank Retired Officers' Association v. Union of India, 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 664 are apt. In all these cases, the prescription of a cut-off date for implementation of such benefits was held not to be arbitrary, irrational or violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - H S Sethi - Full Document

Dei Chand Phogat vs State Of Haryana And Others on 19 July, 2024

In this connection, the ratios in Krishena Kumar v. Union of India, 1990(4) SCC 207; Indian Ex-Services League v. Union of India, 1991(1) S.C.T. 468 : 1991(2) SCC 104; State Government Pensioners' Association v. State of A.P., 1986(3) SCC 501 and All India Reserve Bank Retired Officers' Association v. Union of India, 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 664 are apt. In all these cases, the prescription of a cut-off date for implementation of such benefits was held not to be arbitrary, irrational or violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - H S Sethi - Full Document

Nawab Singh & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 19 July, 2024

In this connection, the ratios in Krishena Kumar v. Union of India, 1990(4) SCC 207; Indian Ex-Services League v. Union of India, 1991(1) S.C.T. 468 : 1991(2) SCC 104; State Government Pensioners' Association v. State of A.P., 1986(3) SCC 501 and All India Reserve Bank Retired Officers' Association v. Union of India, 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 664 are apt. In all these cases, the prescription of a cut-off date for implementation of such benefits was held not to be arbitrary, irrational or violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - H S Sethi - Full Document

Shri Niwas Goyal & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 19 July, 2024

In this connection, the ratios in Krishena Kumar v. Union of India, 1990(4) SCC 207; Indian Ex-Services League v. Union of India, 1991(1) S.C.T. 468 : 1991(2) SCC 104; State Government Pensioners' Association v. State of A.P., 1986(3) SCC 501 and All India Reserve Bank Retired Officers' Association v. Union of India, 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 664 are apt. In all these cases, the prescription of a cut-off date for implementation of such benefits was held not to be arbitrary, irrational or violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - H S Sethi - Full Document

Satish Kumar Chawla vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 19 July, 2024

In this connection, the ratios in Krishena Kumar v. Union of India, 1990(4) SCC 207; Indian Ex-Services League v. Union of India, 1991(1) S.C.T. 468 : 1991(2) SCC 104; State Government Pensioners' Association v. State of A.P., 1986(3) SCC 501 and All India Reserve Bank Retired Officers' Association v. Union of India, 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 664 are apt. In all these cases, the prescription of a cut-off date for implementation of such benefits was held not to be arbitrary, irrational or violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - H S Sethi - Full Document

Kamlesh Kumari & Others vs State Of Haryana & Others on 19 July, 2024

In this connection, the ratios in Krishena Kumar v. Union of India, 1990(4) SCC 207; Indian Ex-Services League v. Union of India, 1991(1) S.C.T. 468 : 1991(2) SCC 104; State Government Pensioners' Association v. State of A.P., 1986(3) SCC 501 and All India Reserve Bank Retired Officers' Association v. Union of India, 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 664 are apt. In all these cases, the prescription of a cut-off date for implementation of such benefits was held not to be arbitrary, irrational or violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - H S Sethi - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next