Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (1.03 seconds)
Documents citing Ashish Kumar Ranjan vs Union Of India & Ors on 6 December, 2016

Dr. Saurabh Dwivedi vs Union Of India on 7 June, 2017

In view of the order dated 18.01.2016 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 76 of 2015 and connected matters titled Ashish Ranjan v. Union of India & Ors., (2016) 11 SCC 225, normally we would be reluctant to extend the time. However, the present case has some 17 peculiar facts of its own. The High Court has, on a totally erroneous basis, set aside a substantial portion of the counselling on 29th May, 2017 which would have resulted in fresh counselling and, therefore, some seats which could be filled up on 30 th or 31st May, 2017 could not be filled up. That process which would have taken only 2 days’ time, would now require a minimum of 5 or 6 days’ time because action will have to be taken afresh.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 7 - Cited by 11 - D Gupta - Full Document

Dr. B.S. Rathore & Others vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Others on 7 July, 2017

In view of the order dated 18.01.2016 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.76 of 2015 and connected matters tilted Ashish Ranjan v. Union of India & Ors., 2016 11 SCC 225, normally we would be reluctant to extend the time. However, the present case has some peculiar facts of its own. The High Court has, on a totally erroneous basis, set aside a substantial portion of the counselling on 29th May, 2017 which would have resulted in fresh counselling and, therefore, some seats which could be filled up on 30th or 31st May, 2017 could not be filled up. That process which would have taken only 2 days; time would now require a minimum of 5 or 6 days' time because action will have to be taken afresh.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dr. B.S. Rathore & Others vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Others on 7 July, 2017

In view of the order dated 18.01.2016 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.76 of 2015 and connected matters tilted Ashish Ranjan v. Union of India & Ors., 2016 11 SCC 225, normally we would be reluctant to extend the time. However, the present case has some peculiar facts of its own. The High Court has, on a totally erroneous basis, set aside a substantial portion of the counselling on 29th May, 2017 which would have resulted in fresh counselling and, therefore, some seats which could be filled up on 30th or 31st May, 2017 could not be filled up. That process which would have taken only 2 days; time would now require a minimum of 5 or 6 days' time because action will have to be taken afresh.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Km. Shivani Singh vs State Of U.P. Thru.Ministry Of Higher ... on 9 September, 2022

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that it appears that in pursuance to the said judgment the State Government issued a Government Order dated 12.06.2018 which provides for forfeiture of the ''security only' and there is no provision in the said Government Order for forfeiture of the fee deposited by the students. With regard to the other grounds, she argues that the students being in a vulnerable position do not have any choice but to sign on the dotted lines and thus the acceptance of resignation with the condition that the security money and the fees would be forfeited is beyond the control of the petitioner.
Allahabad High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 4 - P Bhatia - Full Document

Bhavesh Dhawne vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 2 February, 2017

4. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that large number of candidates who have secured less marks have been allotted various other medical colleges and the petitioner at this juncture, cannot be given admission in any Medical College because the deadline fixed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, keeping in view the judgment delivered in the case of Ashish Ranjan Vs. Union of India and others in W.P. No.76/2015, is over. The petitioner being a more meritorious candidate is being thrown out of College for no fault on his part.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 7 - P K Jaiswal - Full Document
1   2 3 Next