Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.58 seconds)

Banwari Lal Kanchhal vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. ... on 28 November, 2023

In The Committee of Management, Dadar Ashram Trust Society and Ors. vs. Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapeeth and Ors. AIR 2017 All 60, a Division Bench of this Court held that "By virtue of amendment introduced in the Act of 1860, the list of members of society is also required to be filed under Section 4-B with the Registrar at the time of registration or renewal of society. Section 15 of the Act defines 'member' of a society. Section 22 provides power to the Registrar to call for information. Jurisdiction is also vested in the Registrar by virtue of section 24 to conduct investigation in the affairs of the society. From the scheme of Act, it is apparent that the Act of 1860 is a self-contained Code, which provides for registration of literary, scientific and charitable societies. All aspects of the society from the stage of its constitution, registration, membership, election, possessing of property, resolution of dispute of office-bearers and members, are all covered by the Act, and to that extent it is a special law dealing with the societies registered under the Act."
Allahabad High Court Cites 81 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

C/M Of Sri Radha Krishna Adarsh ... vs State Of U.P. Thru' Principal Secy. & ... on 5 October, 2017

In view of the law settled by this Court in various earlier judgments and as elucidated by the Full Bench decision in the case of Dadar Ashram Trust (supra), the direction issued by the Vice-Chancellor while refusing to recognize the Committee of Management headed by Dinesh Chandra Singh, the petitioner no. 2, and observing that the four life members of the Society who were still alive out of nine original life members must produce the list of valid members as recognized on 15.02.1987 before the District Inspector of Schools concerned, and the District Inspector of Schools to thereafter get the election conducted on the basis of the list of the members dated 15.02.1987 is liable to be set aside and is set aside.
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - S Chandra - Full Document

Mahendra Singh vs Shri Guru Singh Sabha Indore on 7 February, 2024

3] On the other hand, counsel for the respondents/intervener have submitted that the petitioners are not entitle to be the members of the society, being the Sahajdhari Sikkh, whereas as per the regulations of the society, only the Sikkh men and women would be eligible for being member of the society. It is also submitted that whether the petitioners can be the members of the society or not, is also a disputed question of fact and thus, the petition itself cannot be entertained on their behalf. A decision of Full Bench has also been relied upon by the counsel for the respondents rendered by the High Court of Allahabad in Special Appeal (D) No.589 of 2016 dated 16/12/2016 in the case of Committee of Management, Dadar Ashram Trust Society and others vs. Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapeeth, Varanasi and others wherein it is held that no mandamus can be issued commanding the authorized Controller/District Magistrate, to hold election of office bearers of a society.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S Abhyankar - Full Document

Arya Pratinidhi Sabha, Lko. Thru. ... vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief/ Prin. ... on 26 August, 2025

4. The neat submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the powers under Section 25 of the Societies Registration Act could not have been exercised without there being any material to suggest that the elections held by either of the rival fractions were invalid. He argues that it is very well settled in the case of Committee of Management, Dadar Ashram Trust Society and others Vs. Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapeeth, Varanasi and others 2016 SCC OnLine All 1072, wherein the Full Bench of this Court has held as under:
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - P Bhatia - Full Document
1