Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 489 (0.75 seconds)
Documents citing C.B.I vs Sadhu Ram Singla & Ors on 23 February, 2017

Narendra Goel vs C B I & Anr on 22 April, 2025

Considering the decision in Signature Not Verified Signed By:HARMINDER KAUR CRL.M.C. 4739/2019 & CRL.M.C. 5777/2019 Page 12 of 14 Signing Date:30.04.2025 12:25:16 CBI v. Sadhu Ram Singla (supra), this Court is not inclined to reject the present petitions merely because the settlement amount is less than the alleged loss suffered by the complainant bank, especially considering that the matter has proceeded at a snail's pace before the learned Trial Court.
Delhi High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Kusum Alloys Limited vs The Delhi Special Establishment By on 2 April, 2018

Firstly, in the facts obtained in the said case viz., in SADHU RAM SINGLA's case, settlement was arrived at between the Borrower and the Bank and it was held that continuation of criminal case where complainant and accused had settled their differences and had arrived at an amicable arrangement and as such continuation of criminal proceedings against accused would not be justified.
Karnataka High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Sri Ashish Kanagali vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 30 September, 2022

13. It is in this background, Sri M.T.Nanaiah, learned Senior Counsel appearing for petitioner has very heavily relied upon judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION vs SADHU RAM SINGLA & OTHERS reported in 2017 CRL.L.J 2269 to buttress his argument that continuation of criminal proceedings against petitioners in the instant case would not sub-serve the ends of justice particularly, in the background of settlement having 40 been arrived at between the Bank and the borrowing company under One Time Settlement Scheme of the Bank, whereunder the lending Bank has issued a Settlement Certificate dated 07.03.2017. He has further submitted that continuation of the proceedings against petitioners in the changed scenario, would be abuse of process of law. Though at first blush said argument looks attractive, it is not so or in other words, it requires to be rejected for reasons for more than one.
Karnataka High Court Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - M Nagaprasanna - Full Document

M/S.Bidass Apparel Industries ... vs The Inspector Of Police on 16 August, 2017

21. From the judicial pronouncement of the Hon'ble Apex Court in various decisions referred to by the learned senior counsel for the petitioners, once the matter is settled between the parties, the commission of non compoundable offences or for criminal conspiracy to commit the offences under Sections 120(B) r/w.420, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC, the dispute between the parties are settled by repayment of loan amount should invariably be quashed. Thus, there is no ratio decidendi has been given by the Hon'ble Apex Court invariably in all the cases, if the matter is settled, the High Court has powers to quash the proceedings depends upon the circumstances of the case and also the offences involved in the case, more so ever, if it is private in nature, the case can be quashed. This Court has no quarrel with the references to the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court. But at the same time, each case has its own merits and demerits and depends on its own facts and a close similarity between one case and another is not enough because even a single significant detail may alter the entire aspect and the gravity of the offences involved in it. The facts and circumstances of the cases above referred to are different from the present case on hand and therefore the same are not applicable to the present case.
Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - P Velmurugan - Full Document

Gurram Sujatha vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 15 December, 2022

8. In the present case, there is no such compromise. The de facto complainant-bank vehemently opposes any such closure of the case on the basis of the compromise that is said to have been affected in the One Time Settlement Scheme. Consequently, the said judgment relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioners would not be applicable to the facts of this case.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

Sanand Chandra Rakesh @ S.C.Rakesh vs State Of Bihar And Anr on 14 May, 2019

10. As has rightly been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner, the dispute is purely personal and related to money Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5556 of 2015 dt.14-05-2019 4/4 matters, which by itself are no matters to be settled in a criminal proceeding. Further, reliance has rightly been placed on the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Yogendra Yadav (supra) J. Ramesh Kamath (supra) and Central Bureau of Investigation vs. Sadhu Ram Singla (supra), where it has been held that under Section 482 of the Code, the High Court should interfere in matters like the present, which are entirely personal and do not affect public peace and tranquility and there is a compromise.
Patna High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - A Amanullah - Full Document

Nagesh Mangalkar And Anr. vs Police Thana on 28 February, 2023

9/ Keeping in view the aforesaid judgments and also keeping in view the fact that parties have arrived at amicable settlement, looking to the dictum of the apex Court in the case of Sadhu Ram Singh (Supra) and Gian Singh (Supra), it would be in the interest of justice to quash the proceedings in connection with Crime No.691/2011 registered at P.S. Tukoganj, Indore 11/ Accordingly, the petition is hereby allowed and the First Information Report bearing Crime No.691/2011 registered at P.S. Tukoganj, Indore for the offence under Section 409, 420, 467, 468 of 8 IPC and all consequential proceedings arising out of the same are hereby quashed.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - A Verma - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next