Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.50 seconds)

Prasanna Kumar Sahu vs State Of Odisha And Others on 13 December, 2023

It is contended that similar view has also been taken by this Court in Smt. Swarnaprava pattnaik @ Das v. Dibakara Satapathy (Dead) through L.Rs Lilly Satapathy @ Page 2 of 3 Panda and others (Writ Appeal No. 346 of 2012 dismissed on 08.12.2016) and in Jyotshna Mohapatra v. State of Odisha, 2018 (I) ILR CUT 869. It is contended that since the cause of action arises from the selfsame issue with regard to approval of the post and the appellant approached the tribunal under Section 24-B of the Odisha Education Act and thereafter respondent no.4 preferred appeal under Section 24-C of the Act before this Court in the FAOs and writ petition, which was examined by the learned Single Judge and consequentially the judgment and order was passed, the writ appeals are not maintainable.
Orissa High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Prasanna Kumar Sahu vs State Of Odisha And Others on 12 January, 2024

It is contended that similar view has also been taken by this Court in Smt. Swarnaprava pattnaik @ Das v. Dibakara Satapathy (Dead) through L.Rs Lilly Satapathy @ Page 2 of 3 Panda and others (Writ Appeal No. 346 of 2012 dismissed on 08.12.2016) and in Jyotshna Mohapatra v. State of Odisha, 2018 (I) ILR CUT 869. It is contended that since the cause of action arises from the selfsame issue with regard to approval of the post and the appellant approached the tribunal under Section 24-B of the Odisha Education Act and thereafter respondent no.4 preferred appeal under Section 24-C of the Act before this Court in the FAOs and writ petition, which was examined by the learned Single Judge and consequentially the judgment and order was passed, the writ appeals are not maintainable.
Orissa High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Prasanna Kumar Sahu vs State Of Odisha And Others on 12 January, 2024

It is contended that similar view has also been taken by this Court in Smt. Swarnaprava pattnaik @ Das v. Dibakara Satapathy (Dead) through L.Rs Lilly Satapathy @ Page 2 of 3 Panda and others (Writ Appeal No. 346 of 2012 dismissed on 08.12.2016) and in Jyotshna Mohapatra v. State of Odisha, 2018 (I) ILR CUT 869. It is contended that since the cause of action arises from the selfsame issue with regard to approval of the post and the appellant approached the tribunal under Section 24-B of the Odisha Education Act and thereafter respondent no.4 preferred appeal under Section 24-C of the Act before this Court in the FAOs and writ petition, which was examined by the learned Single Judge and consequentially the judgment and order was passed, the writ appeals are not maintainable.
Orissa High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1