Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 340 (3.01 seconds)
Documents citing Amlan Jyoti Borooah vs State Of Assam & Ors on 23 January, 2009

Jyoti vs State on 9 April, 2021

4. Ld. counsel for the revisionist argued that impugned order is based of surmises and conjectures without going through the Crl. Revision No. 15/2021 Jyoti Vs. State page no. 2 of 5 entire material and facts of the record. It is also submitted that impugned order is against the principle of natural justice and same is biased one causing material prejudice and grave injustice to the revisionist. One of the contentions of the ld. counsel is that ld. trial court failed to appreciate the fact that jewellary belongs to the revisionist as given to her by her parents at the time of her marriage. Moreover, it is also pointed out that impugned order is not speaking one and hence is unfair, unjustified, unreasonable, misconceived, totally illegal and against the legal propositions of law. It is prayed for setting aside of the impugned order dated 16.12.2020.
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Rajasthan Public Service ... vs Vishnu Datt Saini S/O Govind Narayan ... on 19 May, 2023

It would, thus, be clear that decision in the case of Amlan Jyoti Borooah Vs. State of Assam & Others (supra) turns on its own peculiar facts. From the material facts of the present case which bear distinguishable features inasmuch as in the present case firstly, as has (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 05:29:59 PM) [2022/RJJP/002787] (35 of 38) [SAW-568/2022] been held hereinabove, there is nothing in the advertisement either expressly or by implication that before interview, weightage marks of academics were to be first added to the marks obtained in the screening test/objective type test.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajasthan Public Service Commission vs Anil Kumar S/O Mahendra Singh Sura ... on 19 May, 2023

It would, thus, be clear that decision in the case of Amlan Jyoti Borooah Vs. State of Assam & Others (supra) turns on its own peculiar facts. From the material facts of the present case which bear distinguishable features inasmuch as in the present case firstly, as has (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 05:29:55 PM) [2022/RJJP/002787] (35 of 38) [SAW-568/2022] been held hereinabove, there is nothing in the advertisement either expressly or by implication that before interview, weightage marks of academics were to be first added to the marks obtained in the screening test/objective type test.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajasthan Public Service Commission vs Jitendra Singh Gangwal S/O Shri Madan ... on 19 May, 2023

It would, thus, be clear that decision in the case of Amlan Jyoti Borooah Vs. State of Assam & Others (supra) turns on its own peculiar facts. From the material facts of the present case which bear distinguishable features inasmuch as in the present case firstly, as has (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 05:29:57 PM) [2022/RJJP/002787] (35 of 38) [SAW-568/2022] been held hereinabove, there is nothing in the advertisement either expressly or by implication that before interview, weightage marks of academics were to be first added to the marks obtained in the screening test/objective type test.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajasthan Public Service Commission vs Jitendra Singh Bamboriya Son Of Shri Ram ... on 19 May, 2023

It would, thus, be clear that decision in the case of Amlan Jyoti Borooah Vs. State of Assam & Others (supra) turns on its own peculiar facts. From the material facts of the present case which bear distinguishable features inasmuch as in the present case firstly, as has (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 05:29:58 PM) [2022/RJJP/002787] (35 of 38) [SAW-568/2022] been held hereinabove, there is nothing in the advertisement either expressly or by implication that before interview, weightage marks of academics were to be first added to the marks obtained in the screening test/objective type test.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajasthan Public Service Commission vs Kavindra Son Of Shri Jagdish Prasad ... on 19 May, 2023

It would, thus, be clear that decision in the case of Amlan Jyoti Borooah Vs. State of Assam & Others (supra) turns on its own peculiar facts. From the material facts of the present case which bear distinguishable features inasmuch as in the present case firstly, as has (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 05:30:02 PM) [2022/RJJP/002787] (35 of 38) [SAW-568/2022] been held hereinabove, there is nothing in the advertisement either expressly or by implication that before interview, weightage marks of academics were to be first added to the marks obtained in the screening test/objective type test.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajasthan Public Service Commission vs Jitendra Singh Bamboriya Son Of Shri Ram ... on 19 May, 2023

It would, thus, be clear that decision in the case of Amlan Jyoti Borooah Vs. State of Assam & Others (supra) turns on its own peculiar facts. From the material facts of the present case which bear distinguishable features inasmuch as in the present case firstly, as has (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 05:30:01 PM) [2022/RJJP/002787] (35 of 38) [SAW-568/2022] been held hereinabove, there is nothing in the advertisement either expressly or by implication that before interview, weightage marks of academics were to be first added to the marks obtained in the screening test/objective type test.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vishnu Datt Saini S/O Govind Narayan vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 19 May, 2023

It would, thus, be clear that decision in the case of Amlan Jyoti Borooah Vs. State of Assam & Others (supra) turns on its own peculiar facts. From the material facts of the present case which bear distinguishable features inasmuch as in the present case firstly, as has (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 05:30:04 PM) [2022/RJJP/002787] (35 of 38) [SAW-568/2022] been held hereinabove, there is nothing in the advertisement either expressly or by implication that before interview, weightage marks of academics were to be first added to the marks obtained in the screening test/objective type test.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajasthan Public Service Commission vs Bhanwar Lal Choudhary S/O Shri ... on 19 May, 2023

It would, thus, be clear that decision in the case of Amlan Jyoti Borooah Vs. State of Assam & Others (supra) turns on its own peculiar facts. From the material facts of the present case which bear distinguishable features inasmuch as in the present case firstly, as has (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 05:29:54 PM) [2022/RJJP/002787] (35 of 38) [SAW-568/2022] been held hereinabove, there is nothing in the advertisement either expressly or by implication that before interview, weightage marks of academics were to be first added to the marks obtained in the screening test/objective type test.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next