Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.85 seconds)
Documents citing Mohd. Abdul Kareem And Anr. vs Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board And Ors. on 17 February, 2004

Md. Wasiur Rahman & Anr vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 25 April, 2018

In a similar case, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in case titled as Mohd. Abdul Kareem And Anr. vs. Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board, 2004(2) ALD 345, held that the jurisdiction of the High Court in disputes pertaining to Wakfs can be invoked by way of filing revision petition and not by the medium of a writ petition. It is apt to reproduce paragraph 13 of the said decision hereunder:
Patna High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 2 - A K Singh - Full Document

Mumtaz Ahmed vs Of on 16 November, 2016

In a similar case, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in case titled as Mohd. Abdul Kareem And Anr. vs. Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board, 2004(2) ALD 345, held that the jurisdiction of the High Court in disputes pertaining to Wakfs can be invoked by way of filing revision petition and not by the medium of a writ petition. It is apt to reproduce paragraph 13 of the said decision hereunder:
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - M A Mir - Full Document

Mumtaz Ahmed vs Of on 16 November, 2016

In a similar case, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in case titled as Mohd. Abdul Kareem And Anr. vs. Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board, 2004(2) ALD 345, held that the jurisdiction of the High Court in disputes pertaining to Wakfs can be invoked by way of filing revision petition and not by the medium of a writ petition. It is apt to reproduce paragraph 13 of the said decision hereunder:
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - M A Mir - Full Document

Mumtaz Ahmed vs Of on 16 November, 2016

In a similar case, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in case titled as Mohd. Abdul Kareem And Anr. vs. Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board, 2004(2) ALD 345, held that the jurisdiction of the High Court in disputes pertaining to Wakfs can be invoked by way of filing revision petition and not by the medium of a writ petition. It is apt to reproduce paragraph 13 of the said decision hereunder:
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - M A Mir - Full Document

Mumtaz Ahmed vs Of on 16 November, 2016

In a similar case, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in case titled as Mohd. Abdul Kareem And Anr. vs. Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board, 2004(2) ALD 345, held that the jurisdiction of the High Court in disputes pertaining to Wakfs can be invoked by way of filing revision petition and not by the medium of a writ petition. It is apt to reproduce paragraph 13 of the said decision hereunder:
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - M A Mir - Full Document

Mumtaz Ahmed vs Of on 16 November, 2016

In a similar case, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in case titled as Mohd. Abdul Kareem And Anr. vs. Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board, 2004(2) ALD 345, held that the jurisdiction of the High Court in disputes pertaining to Wakfs can be invoked by way of filing revision petition and not by the medium of a writ petition. It is apt to reproduce paragraph 13 of the said decision hereunder:
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - M A Mir - Full Document

K. Suvaramma And Ors. vs A.P. Wakf Board Rep. By Its Chief ... on 9 October, 2007

7. The Tribunal passed an order of temporary injunction. As observed earlier, Sub-section (9) of Section 83 of Act, attaches the finality to the orders, and no appeal, or revision is provided. However, that finality does not effect the jurisdiction of the High Court, be it, under Article 226, or 227, of the Constitution of India. Obviously, in recognition of this legal position, the Parliament enacted proviso to Sub-section (9), which provides for exercise of jurisdiction of the High Court, in such matters. The objection raised by the respondents, about the maintainability of the writ petition, revolves, mostly around the distinction, between the proceedings under Article 226 on the one hand, and Article 227, on the other, of the Constitution of India. The maintainability of a writ petition against an order passed by a Wakf Tribunal, was dealt with in Mohd. Abdul Kareem v. A.P. Wakf Board . That writ petition was filed against the order passed by the Tribunal, disposing of a suit finally. The writ petition was, almost in the form of an appeal. The submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, with reference to Section 83 of the Act, were examined, in detail, and ultimately it was observed that, once the jurisdiction of the Tribunal is not disputed, the party has invariably to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court, under Article 227, and not under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 11 - Cited by 1 - L N Reddy - Full Document

Mumtaz Ahmed vs Of on 16 November, 2016

In a similar case, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in case titled as Mohd. Abdul Kareem And Anr. vs. Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board, 2004(2) ALD 345, held that the jurisdiction of the High Court in disputes pertaining to Wakfs can be invoked by way of filing revision petition and not by the medium of a writ petition. It is apt to reproduce paragraph 13 of the said decision hereunder:
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - M A Mir - Full Document

Mumtaz Ahmed vs Of on 16 November, 2016

In a similar case, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in case titled as Mohd. Abdul Kareem And Anr. vs. Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board, 2004(2) ALD 345, held that the jurisdiction of the High Court in disputes pertaining to Wakfs can be invoked by way of filing revision petition and not by the medium of a writ petition. It is apt to reproduce paragraph 13 of the said decision hereunder:
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - M A Mir - Full Document

Mumtaz Ahmed vs Of on 16 November, 2016

In a similar case, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in case titled as Mohd. Abdul Kareem And Anr. vs. Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board, 2004(2) ALD 345, held that the jurisdiction of the High Court in disputes pertaining to Wakfs can be invoked by way of filing revision petition and not by the medium of a writ petition. It is apt to reproduce paragraph 13 of the said decision hereunder:
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - M A Mir - Full Document
1   2 Next