Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.59 seconds)

P.Hemalatha vs The Income Tax Officer

4.Per contra, the learned standing counsel for the respondents placed heavy reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in (1993) 4 SCC 77 (M/s.Pool Chand Bajrang Lal Vs. Income Tax Officer and another) which was followed by a learned Judge of this Court in M/s.South Asia Fm Limited Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income 4/8 http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.(MD)Nos.23269 to 23271 of 2018 Tax, Chennai (W.P.Nos.10257, 44312 and 44313 of 2016) dated 10.10.2018. She contended that the petitioner ought not to rush to this Court at the notice stage itself. She pressed for dismissal of these writ petitions.

Raj Arivazhagan vs The Income Tax Officer

4.Per contra, the learned standing counsel for the respondents placed heavy reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 4/8 http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.(MD)Nos.23265 to 23268 of 2018 (1993) 4 SCC 77 (M/s.Pool Chand Bajrang Lal Vs. Income Tax Officer and another) which was followed by a learned Judge of this Court in M/s.South Asia Fm Limited Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai (W.P.Nos.10257, 44312 and 44313 of 2016) dated 10.10.2018. She contended that the petitioner ought not to rush to this Court at the notice stage itself. She pressed for dismissal of these writ petitions.
1