Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 202 (1.07 seconds)

Starlight Bruchem Ltd.,(Formally ... vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy., Deptt. ... on 31 May, 2017

In Ashok Lanka and Another v. Rishi Dixit and Others [(2005) 5 SCC 598], it was held: (SCC p.622, para 57) " We are not oblivious of the fact that framing of rules is not an executive act but a legislative act; but there cannot be any doubt whatsoever that such subordinate legislation must be framed strictly in consonance with the legislative intent as reflected in the rule-making power contained in Section 62 of the Act."
Allahabad High Court Cites 74 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashok Lenka vs Rishi Dikshit & Ors on 21 April, 2006

Even in paragraph 71 of the judgment in Ashok Lanka - I (supra), this Court pointed out the said fact. No serious dispute has been raised that the said contention of the writ petitioners was not correct. But, even if they had no temporary address but they had been able to file their character certificates and proof of permanent address, they cannot be held to be ineligible for the grant of licences. Furthermore, there is nothing to indicate that the District Level Committees had information as to whether the applicants were defaulters in respect of some other State. Such mechanism of scrutiny is not available in the statutory scheme and in our opinion should be provided.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 38 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next