Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 2226 (0.78 seconds)

Salman Alias Sonu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 14 September, 2021

Considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact situation as well as intention of appellant to reform himself and to serve the social cause as per the spirit echoed in the order of Sunita Gandharva (Supra), but with some stringent 3 Cr.A. No.1343/2021 condition as discussed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Aparna Bhatt Vs. State of M.P. reported in 2021 SCC Online 230, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to allow this appeal and impugned order dated 22.08.2019 is set aside in the following terms. It is hereby directed that the appellant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of Trial Court.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 5 - A Pathak - Full Document

Omprakash Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 13 June, 2022

Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and facts situation specially the fact that charge-sheet has already been filed which appears to be more based upon documentary evidence. I ntention of appellant to reform himself and to serve the social cause as per the spirit 4 echoed in the order of Sunita Gandharva (Supra), but with some stringent condition as discussed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Aparna Bhatt Vs. State of M.P. reported in 2021 SCC Online 230, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to allow this appeal and impugned order dated 28.02.2022 is set aside in the following terms. It is hereby directed that the appellant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) with two solvent sureties (each surety should be of Rs.50,000/- of the like amount to the satisfaction of Trial Court.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - A Pathak - Full Document

Ravi Mahor vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 13 June, 2022

Intention of appellant to reform himself and to serve the social cause as per the spirit echoed in the order 5 of Sunita Gandharva (Supra), but with some stringent condition as discussed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Aparna Bhatt Vs. State of M.P. reported in 2021 SCC Online 230, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to allow this appeal and impugned order dated 28.02.2022 is set aside in the following terms. It is hereby directed that the appellant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) with two solvent sureties (each surety should be of Rs.50,000/- of the like amount to the satisfaction of Trial Court.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - A Pathak - Full Document

Mukesh Kushwah vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 22 April, 2021

Considering the period of custody as well as the fact that material prosecution witnesses have been examined and trial may take some time to conclude, but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to allow this appeal and impugned order dated 27.08.2019 is set-aside, but with certain stringent conditions especially looking to the mandate of Apex Court in the case of Aparna Bhat Vs. State of M.P. reported in 2021 SCC Online 230. It is hereby directed that on furnishing bail bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) with two solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of trial Court appellant shall be released on bail.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 10 - A Pathak - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next