Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.37 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Manipur vs Pheiroijam Joy Singh on 1 February, 2001

The State Of Assam vs Arup Das @ Bikram Assam And Anr on 22 April, 2019

12. The learned counsels for the respondent No.1 in both the petitions have also placed reliance upon the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Bhagirathsinh vs. State of Gujarat reported in (1984) 1 SCC 284, Dolat Ram and others vs. State of Haryana, reported in (1995) 1 SCC 349 and a decision of our High Court in State of Manipur vs. Pheiroijam Joy Singh reported in 2001 (1) GLT 592 and submitted that cancellation of bail should not be made by way of punishment and an interference into the order of Sessions Court is not warranted. Very cogent and overwhelming circumstances are necessary for an order of seeking cancellation of bail.
Gauhati High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 1 - R K Phukan - Full Document

Puja Sharma vs The State Of Assam And Anr on 29 October, 2021

14. On the other has, the learned counsel for the accused/opposite party no.2 has relied upon the decisions of the State through the Delhi Administration v. Sanjay Gandhi, reported in 1978 0 AIR (SC) 961 2001; State of Manipur v. Pheiroijam Joy Singh, 2001 2 GauLR 331; Bhagirathsinh Judeja v. State of Gujarat, 1984 0 AIR (SC) 372 and State of Assam v. Chandan Baruah , reported in 2009 2 GauLR 674 - to submit that High Court can cancel the bail only when there are very cogent and overwhelming circumstances. It has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that the power to grant bail is not to be exercised as a punishment before the trial is being invoked.
Gauhati High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 1 - R K Phukan - Full Document
1