Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.47 seconds)

Sh. Pramod Kumar Goel vs The State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) on 28 August, 2019

23. It may be noted here though the Petitioner no.1 Sh. Pramod Kumar Goel may be held to be entitled for the Probate being the executor of the Will, the same shall, however, be issued only after Petitioner No.1 has filed the valuation of the properties both movable and immovable in the Form as given in Schedule III of the Court Fees and accepted by the Court as is required under section 19­I 2 of the Court Fees of the Act and in consequence thereof necessary Court Fee has been filed. One may also make reference to the Judgment of the Hon'ble High Court in DRA Mountford v. Govt of NCT of Delhi 2018 SCC OnLine Del 8892 in this respect. Relevant part of the Judgment reads as under:
Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Tejinder Kaur Gona vs N.C.T. Of Delhi on 25 September, 2019

56. It may noted here though the Petitioners may be held to be entitled to Probate. The same shall, however, be issued only after Petitioner has filed valuation of the property/properties in the Form as given in Schedule III of the Court Fees and accepted by the Court as is required under section 19­I4 of the Court Fees of the Act and in consequence thereof necessary Court Fee has been filed. One may also make reference to the Judgment of the Hon'ble High Court in DRA Mountford v. Govt of NCT of Delhi 2018 SCC OnLine Del 8892 in this respect relevant reads as under:
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Parker H Croft Jr vs State on 3 November, 2022

In Dra Mountford vs. State Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors. TEST.CAS.57/2014 decided on 08th May, 2018 by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court observed that if the proceedings are still pending for determination, there is no impediment to permit amendment of the valuation certificate, since the trial is still under progress. The said judgement is distinguishable in the present case, since here the petition already stands allowed vide Order/Judgement dated 21st September, 2017.
Delhi High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - N B Krishna - Full Document

Pc No.42413 Of 16 Vishwanath Sanyas ... vs State & Anr. 1 Of 22 on 22 August, 2019

(2) The grant of probate or letters of administration shall not be delayed by reason of any motion made by the Collector under section 19H, sub-section (4).] PC No.42413 of 16 Vishwanath Sanyas Ashram Trust Ors. vs.State & Anr. 20 of 22 consequence thereof necessary Court Fee has been filed. One may also make reference to the Judgment of the Hon'ble High Court in DRA Mountford v. Govt of NCT of Delhi 2018 SCC OnLine Del 8892 in this respect relevant reads as under:
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1